Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22399265›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2012

DNA-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis.

Bipasha Dey, Sameer Thukral, Shruti Krishnan, Mainak Chakrobarty, Sahil Gupta, Chanchal Manghani, Vibha Rani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A review of post-GWAS studies in schizophrenia.Translational psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Harnessing regulatory networks in Actinobacteria for natural product discovery.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bipasha DeyDepartment of Biotechnology, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, A-10 Sector-62, Noida 201307, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sameer Thukral
Shruti Krishnan
Mainak Chakrobarty
Sahil Gupta
Chanchal Manghani
Vibha Rani
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-binding proteins control various cellular processes such as recombination, replication and transcription. This review is aimed to summarize some of the most commonly used techniques to determine DNA-protein interactions. In vitro techniques such as footprinting assays, electrophoretic mobility shift assay, southwestern blotting, yeast one-hybrid assay, phage display and proximity ligation assay have been discussed. The highly versatile in vivo techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation and its variants, DNA adenine methyl transferase identification as well as 3C and chip-loop assay have also been summarized. In addition, some in silico tools have been reviewed to provide computational basis for determining DNA-protein interactions. Biophysical techniques like fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) techniques, FRET-FLIM, circular dichroism, atomic force microscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, surface plasmon resonance, etc. have also been highlighted.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalorimetryChromatin ImmunoprecipitationCircular DichroismComputer SimulationDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA FootprintingElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMicroscopy, Atomic ForceModels, MolecularPeptide LibraryProtein BindingDNADNA-Binding ProteinsPeptide Library

Identifiers

PMID22399265
OpenAlexW1990002727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.