Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22399149›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2012

Role of wobble base pair geometry for codon degeneracy: purine-type bases at the anticodon wobble position.

Gunajyoti Das, R H Duncan Lyngdoh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genes · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gunajyoti DasDepartment of Chemistry, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, 793022, India.
R H Duncan Lyngdoh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Codon degeneracy is a key feature of the genetic code, explained by Crick (J Mol Biol 19:548-555, 1966) in terms of imprecision of base pairing at the codon third position (the wobble position) of the codon-anticodon duplex. The Crick wobble rules define, but do not explain, which base pairs are allowed/disallowed at the wobble position of this duplex. This work examines whether the H-bonded configurations of solitary RNA base pairs can in themselves help decide which base pairs are allowed at the wobble position during codon-anticodon pairing. Taking the purine-type bases guanine, hypoxanthine, queuine and adenine as anticodon wobble bases, H-bonded pairing energies and optimized configurations of numerous RNA base pairs are calculated in gas and modeled aqueous phase at the B3LYP/6-31 G(d,p) level. Calculated descriptors of alignment of these solitary base pairs are able to screen between allowed and disallowed base pairs for all cases studied here, except two cases which invoke base-sugar interactions in the codon wobble nucleoside. The exclusion of adenine from the anticodon wobble position cannot be explained on the basis of pairing facility or base pair geometry. These DFT results thus account for the specificity and degeneracy of the genetic code for all cases involving guanine, hypoxanthine and queuine as anticodon wobble bases.

Indexed as

AnticodonBase PairingBase Pair MismatchCodonComputer SimulationGenetic CodeHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationPurine NucleosidesRNAThermodynamicsAnticodonCodonPurine NucleosidesRNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.