ArticleHerz2012
[Periinterventional antiplatelet therapy: from bench to bedside].
Article in Herz, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recruitment and activation of blood platelets initiate ischemic events in patients with coronary artery diseases (myocardial infarction). Moreover, platelet activation and aggregation are key events triggering early and late thrombotic complications (stent thromboses) in patients successfully treated with coronary stent implantation. Hence, the inhibition of the thromboxane A2 synthesis by aspirin and the ADP-receptor pathway by clopidogrel have drastically reduced the risk of ischemic complications following coronary stenting. However, clopidogrel has several inherent limitations, including the high incidence of non- or low-responders and the increased risk of bleeding due to the prolonged persistence of its anti-platelet effect. The latter is of particular concern in patients who require non-deferrable surgery. In recent years, novel anti-platelet substances have been clinically evaluated and are now approved for use in patients. These substances offer several potential advantages over the previous strategies and could pave the way for more individualized anti-platelet regimens. In this review, we give an overview on the available clinical data evaluating the benefits of these novel anti-platelet substances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.