Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22397726›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2012

Insecticide resistance in the sand fly, Phlebotomus papatasi from Khartoum State, Sudan.

Mo'awia Mukhtar Hassan, Sally Osman Widaa, Osman Mohieldin Osman, Mona Siddig Mohammed Numiary, Mihad Abdelaal Ibrahim, Hind Mohammed Abushama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Susceptibility ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of Susceptibility Status ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Insecticide Susceptibility Status of Wild Population ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Monitoring of Laboratory Reared ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mo'awia Mukhtar HassanDepartment of Vector Biology and Biomedical Studies, Tropical Medicine Research Institute, National Centre for Research, Khartoum, Sudan. moawia65@hotmail.com
Sally Osman Widaa
Osman Mohieldin Osman
Mona Siddig Mohammed Numiary
Mihad Abdelaal Ibrahim
Hind Mohammed Abushama
National Centre for Research · SDUniversity of Khartoum · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhlebotomus papatasi the vector of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is the most widely spread sand fly in Sudan. No data has previously been collected on insecticide susceptibility and/or resistance of this vector, and a first study to establish a baseline data is reported here.

methodsSand flies were collected from Surogia village, (Khartoum State), Rahad Game Reserve (eastern Sudan) and White Nile area (Central Sudan) using light traps. Sand flies were reared in the Tropical Medicine Research Institute laboratory. The insecticide susceptibility status of first progeny (F1) of P. papatasi of each population was tested using WHO insecticide kits. Also, P. papatasi specimens from Surogia village and Rahad Game Reserve were assayed for activities of enzyme systems involved in insecticide resistance (acetylcholinesterase (AChE), non-specific carboxylesterases (EST), glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) and cytochrome p450 monooxygenases (Cyt p450).

resultsPopulations of P. papatasi from White Nile and Rahad Game Reserve were sensitive to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), permethrin, malathion, and propoxur. However, the P. papatasi population from Surogia village was sensitive to DDT and permethrin but highly resistant to malathion and propoxur. Furthermore, P. papatasi of Surogia village had significantly higher insecticide detoxification enzyme activity than of those of Rahad Game Reserve. The sand fly population in Surogia displayed high AChE activity and only three specimens had elevated levels for EST and GST.

conclusionsThe study provided evidence for malathion and propoxur resistance in the sand fly population of Surogia village, which probably resulted from anti-malarial control activities carried out in the area during the past 50 years.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsInsecticide ResistanceAcetylcholinesteraseAnimalsCarboxylesteraseCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemFemaleGlutathione TransferaseInsecticidesMalathionPhlebotomusPrevalencePropoxurSudanAcetylcholinesteraseCarboxylesteraseCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemGlutathione TransferaseInsecticidesMalathionPropoxur

Identifiers

PMID22397726
PMCPMC3314797
OpenAlexW2115532634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.