ArticleClinical investigation2011
Neoplastic meningitis resulting from hematological malignancies: pharmacokinetic considerations and maximizing outcome.
Article in Clinical investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Branched-chain keto acids promote an immune-suppressive and neurodegenerative microenvironment in leptomeningeal disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Leptomeningeal Metastases.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018Review
- Neuro-ophthalmologic complications of neoplastic leptomeningeal disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neoplastic meningitis, also known as leptomeningeal metastases, is a complication of various types of cancer that occurs when tumor cells enter the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), travel along CSF pathways and grow. Treatment options include drug delivery directly into the CNS or systemic administration for targeted action in the CNS. CNS drug delivery is limited by the blood-brain barrier and the blood-CSF barrier. It may be possible to partially overcome this by using high-dose systemic therapy; however, this is done at the possible expense of increased systemic toxicity. Intra-CSF drug delivery bypasses the blood-brain barrier and allows direct access of the chemotherapeutic agent to the CSF. Because neoplastic meningitis occurs in an increasingly large percentage of all cancer patients, it is imperative to optimize drug delivery to the CSF and meninges. Both the pharmacokinetic profile of the chemotherapeutic agent and the site of administration influence therapeutic efficacy. Achieving prolonged therapeutic cytotoxic drug concentrations and even distribution in the CSF will improve efficacy. In this article we summarize data on the efficacy, safety and outcome of high-dose systemic and intra-CSF treatments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.