ArticlePloS one2012
Do stacked species distribution models reflect altitudinal diversity patterns?
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of structural connectivity on the assemblage diversity patterns of central Mexico icthyofauna.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Assessing the Distribution and Richness of Mammalian Species Using a Stacking Species Distribution Model in a Temperate Forest.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- A quixotic view of spatial bias in modelling the distribution of species and their diversity.npj biodiversity · 2023Review
- Stacked distribution models predict climate-driven loss of variation in leaf phenology at continental scales.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Ericaceous vegetation of the Bale Mountains of Ethiopia will prevail in the face of climate change.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Predicting Hotspots and Prioritizing Protected Areas for Endangered Primate Species in Indonesia under Changing Climate.Biology · 2021Article
- Likelihood of changes in forest species suitability, distribution, and diversity under future climate: The case of Southern Europe.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
- Biodiversity Models: What If Unsaturation Is the Rule?Trends in ecology & evolution · 2017Review
- The mossy north: an inverse latitudinal diversity gradient in European bryophytes.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- How to describe species richness patterns for bryophyte conservation?Ecology and evolution · 2015Article
- Can Species Distribution Models Aid Bioassessment when Reference Sites are Lacking? Tests Based on Freshwater Fishes.Environmental management · 2015Article
- Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks.Diversity & distributions · 2014Article
- Modeling Hawaiian ecosystem degradation due to invasive plants under current and future climates.PloS one · 2014Article
- Nonlinear distribution pattern of hibernating bats in caves along an elevational gradient in mountain (Carpathians, Southern Poland).PloS one · 2013Article
- Modeling species distributions from heterogeneous data for the biogeographic regionalization of the European bryophyte flora.PloS one · 2013Article
- Legume diversity patterns in West Central Africa: influence of species biology on distribution models.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of stacked species distribution models in predicting the alpha and gamma species diversity patterns of two important plant clades along elevation in the Andes. We modelled the distribution of the species in the Anthurium genus (53 species) and the Bromeliaceae family (89 species) using six modelling techniques. We combined all of the predictions for the same species in ensemble models based on two different criteria: the average of the rescaled predictions by all techniques and the average of the best techniques. The rescaled predictions were then reclassified into binary predictions (presence/absence). By stacking either the original predictions or binary predictions for both ensemble procedures, we obtained four different species richness models per taxa. The gamma and alpha diversity per elevation band (500 m) was also computed. To evaluate the prediction abilities for the four predictions of species richness and gamma diversity, the models were compared with the real data along an elevation gradient that was independently compiled by specialists. Finally, we also tested whether our richness models performed better than a null model of altitudinal changes of diversity based on the literature. Stacking of the ensemble prediction of the individual species models generated richness models that proved to be well correlated with the observed alpha diversity richness patterns along elevation and with the gamma diversity derived from the literature. Overall, these models tend to overpredict species richness. The use of the ensemble predictions from the species models built with different techniques seems very promising for modelling of species assemblages. Stacking of the binary models reduced the over-prediction, although more research is needed. The randomisation test proved to be a promising method for testing the performance of the stacked models, but other implementations may still be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.