Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22396746›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Rapid and accurate prediction and scoring of water molecules in protein binding sites.

Gregory A Ross, Garrett M Morris, Philip C Biggin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Enthalpic Classification of Water Molecules in Target-Ligand Binding.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. WaterKit: Thermodynamic Profiling of Protein Hydration Sites.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Water Networks in Complexes between Proteins and FDA-Approved Drugs.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Predicting Protein-Ligand Docking Structure with Graph Neural Network.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gregory A RossStructural Bioinformatics and Computational Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Garrett M Morris
Philip C Biggin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water plays a critical role in ligand-protein interactions. However, it is still challenging to predict accurately not only where water molecules prefer to bind, but also which of those water molecules might be displaceable. The latter is often seen as a route to optimizing affinity of potential drug candidates. Using a protocol we call WaterDock, we show that the freely available AutoDock Vina tool can be used to predict accurately the binding sites of water molecules. WaterDock was validated using data from X-ray crystallography, neutron diffraction and molecular dynamics simulations and correctly predicted 97% of the water molecules in the test set. In addition, we combined data-mining, heuristic and machine learning techniques to develop probabilistic water molecule classifiers. When applied to WaterDock predictions in the Astex Diverse Set of protein ligand complexes, we could identify whether a water molecule was conserved or displaced to an accuracy of 75%. A second model predicted whether water molecules were displaced by polar groups or by non-polar groups to an accuracy of 80%. These results should prove useful for anyone wishing to undertake rational design of new compounds where the displacement of water molecules is being considered as a route to improved affinity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBinding SitesComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayHydrogen BondingLigandsModels, StatisticalMolecular ConformationMonte Carlo MethodProbabilityProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareSolventsWaterLigandsProteinsSolventsWater

Identifiers

PMID22396746
PMCPMC3291545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.