Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22396633›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2012

How cells integrate complex stimuli: the effect of feedback from phosphoinositides and cell shape on cell polarization and motility.

Athanasius F M Marée, Verônica A Grieneisen, Leah Edelstein-Keshet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sensing the shape of a cell with reaction diffusion and energy minimization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Athanasius F M MaréeComputational & Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom. stan.maree@jic.ac.uk
Verônica A Grieneisen
Leah Edelstein-Keshet

Funding

Control of Actin Assembly and Cell Migration by Actin-Regulating ProteinsR01GM086882 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CARLSSON, ANDERS E · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000C0645Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000C0646NIGMS NIH HHS GM086882NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To regulate shape changes, motility and chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells, signal transduction pathways channel extracellular stimuli to the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. The complexity of such networks makes it difficult to understand the roles of individual components, let alone their interactions and multiple feedbacks within a given layer and between layers of signalling. Even more challenging is the question of if and how the shape of the cell affects and is affected by this internal spatiotemporal reorganization. Here we build on our previous 2D cell motility model where signalling from the Rho family GTPases (Cdc42, Rac, and Rho) was shown to organize the cell polarization, actin reorganization, shape change, and motility in simple gradients. We extend this work in two ways: First, we investigate the effects of the feedback between the phosphoinositides (PIs) PIP₂, PIP₃ and Rho family GTPases. We show how that feedback increases heights and breadths of zones of Cdc42 activity, facilitating global communication between competing cell "fronts". This hastens the commitment to a single lamellipodium initiated in response to multiple, complex, or rapidly changing stimuli. Second, we show how cell shape feeds back on internal distribution of GTPases. Constraints on chemical isocline curvature imposed by boundary conditions results in the fact that dynamic cell shape leads to faster biochemical redistribution when the cell is repolarized. Cells with frozen cytoskeleton, and static shapes, consequently respond more slowly to reorienting stimuli than cells with dynamic shape changes, the degree of the shape-induced effects being proportional to the extent of cell deformation. We explain these concepts in the context of several in silico experiments using our 2D computational cell model.

Indexed as

Cell SizeModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell PolarityChemotaxisComputer SimulationFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansPhosphatidylinositolsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsPhosphatidylinositolsrho GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22396633
PMCPMC3291540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.