Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22396159›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2012

The structural biology of the FGF19 subfamily.

Andrew Beenken, Moosa Mohammadi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. FGF-based drug discovery: advances and challenges.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Exploring endocrine FGFs - structures, functions and biomedical applications.International journal of biochemistry and molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Basis of Bile Acid-FXR-FGF15/19 Signaling Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Metabolic Messengers: FGF21.Nature metabolism · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew BeenkenDepartment of Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Moosa Mohammadi
New York University · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF FGF RECEPTOR REGULATION AND SIGNALINGR01DE013686 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MOHAMMADI, MOOSA · 2000 to 2020
$12.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of the Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) 19 subfamily to signal in an endocrine fashion sets this subfamily apart from the remaining five FGF subfamilies known for their paracrine functions during embryonic development. Compared to the members of paracrine FGF subfamiles, the three members of the FGF19 subfamily, namely FGF19, FGF21 and FGF23, have poor affinity for heparan sulfate (HS) and therefore can diffuse freely in the HS-rich extracellular matrix to enter into the bloodstream. In further contrast to paracrine FGFs, FGF19 subfamily members have unusually poor affinity for their cognate FGF receptors (FGFRs) and therefore cannot bind and activate them in a solely HS-dependent fashion. As a result, the FGF19 subfamily requires α/βklotho coreceptor proteins in order to bind, dimerize and activate their cognate FGFRs. This klotho-dependency also determines the tissue specificity of endocrine FGFs. Recent structural and biochemical studies have begun to shed light onto the molecular basis for the klotho-dependent endocrine mode of action of the FGF19 subfamily. Crystal structures of FGF19 and FGF23 show that the topology of the HS binding site (HBS) of FGF19 subfamily members deviates drastically from the common topology adopted by the paracrine FGFs. The distinct topologies of the HBS of FGF19 and FGF23 prevent HS from direct hydrogen bonding with the backbone atoms of the HBS of these ligands and accordingly decrease the HS binding affinity of this subfamily. Recent biochemical data reveal that the ?klotho ectodomain binds avidly to the ectodomain of FGFR1c, the main cognate FGFR of FGF23, creating a de novo high affinity binding site for the C-terminal tail of FGF23. The isolated FGF23 C-terminus can be used to effectively inhibit the formation of the FGF23-FGFR1c-αklotho complex and alleviate hypophosphatemia in renal phosphate disorders due to elevated levels of FGF23.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsEndocrine SystemFibroblast Growth Factor-23Fibroblast Growth FactorsGlucuronidaseHumansKlotho ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataSignal TransductionStructure-Activity RelationshipFGF23 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor-23Fibroblast Growth FactorsGlucuronidaseKlotho Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22396159
PMCPMC3682411
OpenAlexW1519326211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.