ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2012
Using dissociation energies to predict observability of b- and y-peaks in mass spectra of short peptides.
Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Assessment of Deep Learning-Based Predictors of Fragmentation Intensity Profiles.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- N-Protonated Isomers and Coulombic Barriers to Dissociation of Doubly Protonated AlaJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017Article
- Identification of Microorganisms by High Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Accurate Statistical Significance.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2016Article
- Using dissociation energies to predict observability of b- and y-peaks in mass spectra of short peptides. II. Results for hexapeptides with non-polar side chains.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationalePeptide identification reliability can be improved by excluding from analysis those m/z peaks of candidate peptides which cannot be observed in practice due to various physical, chemical or thermodynamic considerations. We propose using dissociation energies (as opposed to proton affinities) as a predictor of observability of different m/z peaks in spectra of short peptides.
methodsMass spectra of the tetrapeptides AAAA, AAFA, AAVA, AFAA, AVAA, AFFA, and AVVA were measured in the collision-induced dissociation (CID) activation mode on a grid of activation times 0.05 to 100 ms and normalized collision energy 10 to 35%. The lowest energy geometries and vibrational spectra were calculated for the precursor ions and their charged and neutral fragments using density functional theory (DFT) at the TPSS/6-31G(d,p) level. Dissociation energies were calculated for all fragmentation channels leading to b- or y-fragments.
resultsIt is demonstrated that m/z peaks observed in the mass spectra correspond to the fragmentation channels with the lowest dissociation energies. Using 50 kcal/mol as the cut-off value of dissociation energy, it was predicted that 28 out of 42 possible peaks in the b- and y-series of the seven tetrapeptides can be observed in mass spectra. In the experiments, 26 b- or y-peaks were observed, all of which are among the 28 predicted ones.
conclusionsThe use of dissociation energies generalizes the use of proton affinities for semi-quantitative predictions of relative intensities of different m/z peaks of short peptides. Further advances in this direction will pave the way for reliable quantitative predictions and, hence, for a significant improvement in robustness and accuracy of peptide and protein identification tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.