Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22396005›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2012

Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Charlotte S van Kessel, Constantinus F M Buckens, Maurice A A J van den Bosch, Maarten S van Leeuwen, Richard van Hillegersberg, Helena M Verkooijen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Missing colorectal liver metastases: the surgical challenge.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Colorectal cancer (CRC) monitoring by 6-monthly 18FDG-PET/CT: an open-label multicentre randomised trial.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Free-breathing phase-sensitive inversion recovery TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Imaging of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte S van KesselDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.s.vankessel@umcutrecht.nl
Constantinus F M Buckens
Maurice A A J van den Bosch
Maarten S van Leeuwen
Richard van Hillegersberg
Helena M Verkooijen
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemotherapy treatment induces parenchymal changes that potentially affect imaging of CRLM. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide values of diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and FDG-PET/CT for preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsA comprehensive search was performed for original articles published from inception to 2011 assessing diagnostic performance of MRI, CT, FDG-PET, or FDG-PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of CRLM following chemotherapy. Intraoperative findings and/or histology were used as reference standard. For each imaging modality we calculated pooled sensitivities for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as for chemonaive patients, defined as number of malignant lesions detected divided by number of malignant lesions as confirmed by the reference standard.

resultsA total of 11 papers, comprising 223 patients with 906 lesions, were included. Substantial variation in study design, patient characteristics, imaging features, and reference tests was observed. Pooled sensitivity estimates of MRI, CT, FDG-PET, and FDG-PET/CT were 85.7% (69.7-94.0%), 69.9% (65.6-73.9%), 54.5% (46.7-62.1%), and 51.7% (37.8-65.4%), respectively. In chemonaive patients, sensitivity rates were 80.5% (67.0-89.4%) for CT, 81.3% (64.1-91.4%) for FDG-PET, and 71.0% (64.3-76.9%) for FDG-PET/CT. Specificity could not be calculated because of non-reporting of "true negative lesions."

conclusionIn the neoadjuvant setting, MRI appears to be the most appropriate imaging modality for preoperative assessment of patients with CRLM. CT is the second-best diagnostic modality and should be used in the absence of MRI. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET and PET-CT is strongly affected by chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedColorectal NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLiver NeoplasmsMultimodal ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyPositron-Emission TomographySensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID22396005
PMCPMC3433675
OpenAlexW1982351290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.