Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22395974›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2012

Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer.

Koen Talsma, Pieter van Hagen, Brechtje A Grotenhuis, Ewout W Steyerberg, Hugo W Tilanus, Jan J B van Lanschot, Bas P L Wijnhoven

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An ultrasound model for predicting recurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma after complete endoscopic resection.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  9. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection for esophageal cancer: clinical outcomes with the 'CROSS-regimen' in daily practice.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Koen TalsmaDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. koentalsma@hotmail.com
Pieter van Hagen
Brechtje A Grotenhuis
Ewout W Steyerberg
Hugo W Tilanus
Jan J B van Lanschot
Bas P L Wijnhoven
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe new 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control-American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC-AJCC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system is the ratification of data-driven recommendations from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database. Generalizability remains questionable for single institutions. The present study serves as a validation of the 7th edition of the TNM system in a prospective cohort of patients with predominantly adenocarcinomas from a single institution.

methodsIncluded were patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent between 1991 and 2008 for invasive carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Excluded were patients who had received neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, patients after a noncurative resection and patients who died in the hospital. Tumors were staged according to both the 6th and the 7th editions of the UICC-AJCC staging systems. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analysis was performed with a Cox regression model. The likelihood ratio chi-square test related to the Cox regression model and the Akaike information criterion were used for measuring goodness of fit.

resultsA study population of 358 patients was identified. All patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma. Overall 5-year survival rate was 38%. Univariate analysis revealed that pT stage, pN stage, and pM stage significantly predicted overall survival. Prediction was best for the 7th edition, stratifying for all substages.

conclusionsThe application of the 7th UICC-AJCC staging system results in a better prognostic stratification of overall survival compared to the 6th edition. The fact that the 7th edition performs better predominantly in patients with adenocarcinomas who underwent a transhiatal surgical approach, in addition to findings from earlier research in other cohorts, supports its generalizability for different esophageal cancer practices.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID22395974
PMCPMC3381120
OpenAlexW2095461835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.