Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22395889›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012

Effect of treatment on the rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study observation group.

Carlos Gustavo De Moraes, Shaban Demirel, Stuart K Gardiner, Jeffrey M Liebmann, George A Cioffi, Robert Ritch, Mae O Gordon, Michael A Kass, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000125 (Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000125 phase3completednot on this map

Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan1994 to 2019Enrolled1,636ConditionsOcular Hypertension, GlaucomaArmsTopical ocular hypotensive eye drops.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension with Preservative-Free Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy: Results from the VISIONARY Study Population in Spain.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Gustavo De MoraesEinhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY 10003, USA. demoraesmd@gmail.com
Shaban Demirel
Stuart K Gardiner
Jeffrey M Liebmann
George A Cioffi
Robert Ritch
Mae O Gordon
Michael A Kass
Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group
Legacy Health · USWashington University in St. Louis · USNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary · USNew York Medical College · USNew York University · US

Funding

OCULAR HYPERTENSION TREATMENT STUDY (OHTS)U10EY009307 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, MICHAEL A · 1992 to 2009
$14.8M
OHTS DATA COORDINATIONU10EY009341 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GORDON, MAE O · 1992 to 2009
$12.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY09307NEI NIH HHS EY09341NEI NIH HHS U10 EY009307NEI NIH HHS U10 EY009341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal in this study was to compare rates of visual field (VF) change before and after the initiation of treatment in participants originally randomized to the observation arm of the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).

methodsWe included OHTS participants originally randomized to observation and excluded those who reached non-POAG endpoints. VF progression was determined using trend analysis. Global and localized rates of VF change were calculated based on linear regression over time of mean deviation (MD) and threshold sensitivity values for each test location. MD rates (MDR) and pointwise linear regression (PLR) analysis were also assessed using six VF tests before and after the initiation of treatment. A PLR endpoint was defined as a VF test location progressing faster than -0.5 dB/year at P < 0.01.

resultsWe included 780 eyes from 432 OHTS participants. Following the initiation of treatment, the mean MDR decreased from -0.23 ± 0.6 to -0.06 ± 0.5 dB/year (P < 0.01) and the number of VF locations reaching a PLR endpoint decreased from 2.13 ± 6.0 to 1.00 ± 4.0 (P < 0.01). The benefit of treatment was significant both among participants who did not convert (-0.17 ± 0.6 vs. -0.01 ± 0.5 dB/year, P < 0.01) and among those who converted to glaucoma (-0.51 ± 0.8 vs. -0.27 ± 0.7 dB/year, P < 0.01) based on the OHTS event-based endpoint.

conclusionsThe initiation of ocular hypotensive medication among OHTS participants originally randomized to observation significantly reduced the velocity of VF progression.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAntihypertensive AgentsDisease ProgressionGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIncidenceIntraocular PressureObservationOcular HypertensionVision DisordersVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID22395889
PMCPMC3342789
OpenAlexW2141218290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.