Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2012
High positive predictive value of PAPP-A for acute coronary syndrome diagnosis in heparin-naïve patients.
Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PAPP-A Protein Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance in Acute Coronary Syndromes Without Persistent ST-T-Segment Elevation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive value of serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A for patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2017Article
- Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) as a possible biomarker in patients with coronary artery disease.Irish journal of medical science · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) was studied as a marker of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). It has been shown that its levels are increased by heparin administration. Therefore, the aim of our study was to ascertain the diagnostic significance of PAPP-A in heparin-naïve patients and compare it with (TnI). We prospectively studied 67 heparin-naïve patients with acute chest pain. The patients were independently grouped according to the presence or absence of ACS. PAPP-A levels were significantly increased in ACS patients (8.6 vs. 7.3 mIU/l; P = 0.006) with high positive (95.7%) and lower negative predictive values (47.7%). In multivariate analysis, its levels were strongly predictive of a final diagnosis of ACS (OR 41.8; 95th CI 2.64-662.6; P = 0.008). The diagnostic significance of PAPP-A was not higher than TnI even within 6 h after the onset of chest pain [the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.69 for PAPP-A and 0.91 for TnI, respectively; P = 0.08]. We observed no difference in the AUC in NSTE-ACS patients (0.73 for PAPP-A and 0.79 for TnI (P = 0.5)). PAPP-A levels were an independent predictor of ACS diagnosis in heparin-naïve patients. Its diagnostic significance was not higher than TnI even within a short period after the onset of chest pain. In troponin-negative NSTE-ACS patients, PAPP-A helped make the correct final diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22395770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.