Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22395739›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2012

Fluid flows and forces in development: functions, features and biophysical principles.

Jonathan B Freund, Jacky G Goetz, Kent L Hill, Julien Vermot

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Utility of anLab on a chip · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Coacervate Dense Phase Displaces Surface-EstablishedJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Directional Cell Migration Guided by a Strain Gradient.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Harnessing mechanobiology for kidney organoid research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan B FreundUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Jacky G Goetz
Kent L Hill
Julien Vermot

Funding

Biochemical and Functional Analysis of TrypaninR01AI052348 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HILL, KENT L · 2002 to 2023
$7.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052348NIAID NIH HHS R01AI052348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout morphogenesis, cells experience intracellular tensile and contractile forces on microscopic scales. Cells also experience extracellular forces, such as static forces mediated by the extracellular matrix and forces resulting from microscopic fluid flow. Although the biological ramifications of static forces have received much attention, little is known about the roles of fluid flows and forces during embryogenesis. Here, we focus on the microfluidic forces generated by cilia-driven fluid flow and heart-driven hemodynamics, as well as on the signaling pathways involved in flow sensing. We discuss recent studies that describe the functions and the biomechanical features of these fluid flows. These insights suggest that biological flow determines many aspects of cell behavior and identity through a specific set of physical stimuli and signaling pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysicsCiliaDevelopmental BiologyEndothelial CellsHumansModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisSignal TransductionStress, MechanicalTensile StrengthZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID22395739
PMCPMC3294433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.