ArticlePediatric radiology2012
Postnatal imaging of neonates with prenatally diagnosed genitourinary abnormalities: a practical approach.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging Diagnosis of Major Kidney and Urinary Tract Disorders in Children.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Approach to the postnatal sonographic evaluation of prenatally detected abdominopelvic cysts.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2022Article
- The Emerging Role of MR Urography in Imaging Megaureters in Children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Urinary Ultrasound and Other Imaging for Ureteropelvic Junction Type Hydronephrosis (UPJHN).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
- Ultrasonography of hydronephrosis in the newborn: a practical review.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2016Review
- Diagnostic value of combined static-excretory MR Urography in children with hydronephrosis.Journal of advanced research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of prenatal US and, more recently, fetal MRI has changed our pattern of referrals. In the current clinical algorithms, most neonates evaluated for genitourinary abnormalities are asymptomatic. These infants are referred for multidisciplinary consultation, imaging and surveillance. Evaluation of these children commences following pertinent review of available prenatal studies; this is appropriate, as in certain instances prenatally gathered information of potential prognostic significance can be inferred or can obviate the need for multiple examinations. US remains the first-line imaging modality for diagnosing urinary abnormalities in neonates and young infants, although it offers primarily morphological assessment. However, US coupled with MAG-3 scanning results in a powerful combination that provides anatomical and functional information. Recently, MRI and MR urography have been increasingly regarded as one-stop-shop examinations that can deliver both anatomical and functional information, and play an increasing role in the evaluation of ureteral ectopia and genital anomalies. Fluoroscopic examinations are reserved to exclude vesicoureteral reflux, to delineate urethral obstruction or to provide additional information to support a diagnosis. A practical approach to postnatal imaging of the neonate is discussed and the important genitourinary anomalies in this age group are presented and illustrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.