ReviewCurrent opinion in gastroenterology2012
Genetic profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Review in Current opinion in gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting cisplatin response in cholangiocarcinoma patients using chromosome pattern and related gene expression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Racial and Sex Differences in Genomic Profiling of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Unveil Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Heterogeneity through the Lens of Omics and Multi-Omics Approaches.Cancers · 2024Review
- The role and implication of autophagy in cholangiocarcinoma.Cell death discovery · 2023Review
- Optimizing Circulating Tumour DNA Use in the Perioperative Setting for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnosis, Screening, Minimal Residual Disease Detection and Treatment Response Monitoring.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Review
- DNA Damage Response Inhibitors in Cholangiocarcinoma: Current Progress and Perspectives.Cells · 2022Review
- Structure-activity features of purines and their receptors: implications in cell physiopathology.Molecular biomedicine · 2022Review
- Genomic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma: clinical significance and relevance to therapy.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2022Review
- MiR-206 suppresses the deterioration of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and promotes sensitivity to chemotherapy by inhibiting interactions with stromal CAFs.International journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: The Role of Sequencing Genetic Profiling.Cancers · 2021Article
- Co-expression of YAP and TAZ associates with chromosomal instability in human cholangiocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Cholangiocarcinoma and liver transplantation: What we know so far?World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2021Review
- Targeted therapies for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: preclinical and clinical development and prospects for the clinic.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2021Review
- Review
- Targeted deep sequencing contributes to guiding personalized targeted therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer patients with non‑radical resection: A real‑world study.Oncology reports · 2020Article
- Applied precision cancer medicine in metastatic biliary tract cancer.Hepatology international · 2020Article
- Screening and identification of genes associated with cell proliferation in cholangiocarcinoma.Aging · 2020Article
- Immunohistochemical and molecular features of cholangiolocellular carcinoma are similar to well-differentiated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019Article
- Context-Dependent Role of NF-κB Signaling in Primary Liver Cancer-from Tumor Development to Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2019Review
- Dietary Melatonin Supplementation Could Be a Promising Preventing/Therapeutic Approach for a Variety of Liver Diseases.Nutrients · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a treatment-refractory disease with a dismal outcome. Limited success in the clinical management and a persistent increase in the incidence world-wide have made ICC one of the most lethal and fastest growing malignancies. However, recent advancements in genome-wide technologies combined with the application of integrative multidimensional analytical approaches have begun to provide both detailed insight into the underlying biological traits of ICC and identified new therapeutic opportunities. RECENT
findingsIn comparison with other cancers, genomic studies of ICC have been limited. We and others have recently procured large cohorts of ICC patients intended for genome-wide analyses. In our study, samples from ICC patients were obtained from three cancer centers and subjected to integrated genetic and genomic analyses. We provided new insights into both pathogenesis and optimal treatment options demonstrating the presence of unique subclasses of patients, based partly on KRAS mutations and increased levels of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. The group of patients with the worst prognosis was characterized by transcriptional enrichment of genes regulating inflammation and proteasome activities, suggesting a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anti-inflammatory drugs as a new therapeutic option for these patients. SUMMARY: We have critically examined the progress in genome-wide studies of ICC including genetic profiling, transcriptomics, and epigenomics. Current limitations in applying these technologies to archival samples and the insufficient access to fresh-frozen material are partly the cause of the delayed implementation of the omics-based investigations of ICC compared to other hepatobiliary diseases. Thus, selected candidate single-gene studies will also be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.