Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22395197›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2012

Reproducible mouse sciatic nerve crush and subsequent assessment of regeneration by whole mount muscle analysis.

Andrew R Bauder, Toby A Ferguson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. eNeuro · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prevention of the foreign body response to implantable medical devices by inflammasome inhibition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Axon Regeneration: A Subcellular Extension in Multiple Dimensions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew R BauderCenter for Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Temple University, PA, USA.
Toby A Ferguson
Temple University · US

Funding

The Role of Hyaluronic Acid Receptors in Tendon HealingP30AR050950 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BALDWIN, DONALD A · 2006 to 2015
$6.2M
Axon-glial interactions mediating axonal regenerationK08NS065157 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FERGUSON, TOBY A · 2009 to 2013
$921k
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR050950NIAMS NIH HHS P30AR050950NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS065157NINDS NIH HHS K08NS065157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is widely studied both for its relevance to human disease and to understand the robust regenerative response mounted by PNS neurons thereby possibly illuminating the failures of CNS regeneration(1). Sciatic nerve crush (axonotmesis) is one of the most common models of peripheral nerve injury in rodents(2). Crushing interrupts all axons but Schwann cell basal laminae are preserved so that regeneration is optimal(3,4). This allows the investigator to study precisely the ability of a growing axon to interact with both the Schwann cell and basal laminae(4). Rats have generally been the preferred animal models for experimental nerve crush. They are widely available and their lesioned sciatic nerve provides a reasonable approximation of human nerve lesions(5,4). Though smaller in size than rat nerve, the mouse nerve has many similar qualities. Most importantly though, mouse models are increasingly valuable because of the wide availability of transgenic lines now allows for a detailed dissection of the individual molecules critical for nerve regeneration(6, 7). Prior investigators have used multiple methods to produce a nerve crush or injury including simple angled forceps, chilled forceps, hemostatic forceps, vascular clamps, and investigator-designed clamps(8,9,10,11,12). Investigators have also used various methods of marking the injury site including suture, carbon particles and fluorescent beads(13,14,1). We describe our method to obtain a reproducibly complete sciatic nerve crush with accurate and persistent marking of the crush-site using a fine hemostatic forceps and subsequent carbon crush-site marking. As part of our description of the sciatic nerve crush procedure we have also included a relatively simple method of muscle whole mount we use to subsequently quantify regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHindlimbMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle, SkeletalNerve CrushNerve RegenerationReproducibility of ResultsSciatic Nerve

Identifiers

PMID22395197
PMCPMC3376939
OpenAlexW1992487002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.