Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22394224›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on investigational drugs2012

A drug evaluation of 1% tenofovir gel and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets for the prevention of HIV infection.

Tanuja N Gengiah, Cheryl Baxter, Leila E Mansoor, Ayesha Bm Kharsany, Salim S Abdool Karim

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Microbicides: still a long road to success.Trends in microbiology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanuja N GengiahCentre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Congella, Durban, South Africa. gengiaht1@ukzn.ac.za
Cheryl Baxter
Leila E Mansoor
Ayesha Bm Kharsany
Salim S Abdool Karim
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAColumbia University · US

Funding

The Viral Set Point in HIV-1 Subtype C InfectionU19AI051794 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI ABDOOL KARIM, SALIM S · 2002 to 2007
$22.5M
TUBERCULOSIS SUPPLEMENTD43TW000231 · FIC · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ABDOOL KARIM, QUARRAISHA · 1993 to 2014
$13.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000231FIC NIH HHS D43TW00231NIAID NIH HHS AI51794NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI051794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMore than a million people acquire HIV infection annually. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) using antiretrovirals is currently being investigated for HIV prevention. Oral and topical formulations of tenofovir have undergone preclinical and clinical testing to assess acceptability, safety and effectiveness in preventing HIV infection. AREAS COVERED: The tenofovir drug development pathway from compound discovery, preclinical animal model testing and human testing were reviewed for safety, tolerability and efficacy. Tenofovir is well tolerated and safe when used both systemically or applied topically for HIV prevention. High drug concentrations at the site of HIV transmission and concomitant low systemic drug concentrations are achieved with vaginal application. Coitally applied gel may be the favored prevention option for women compared with the tablets, which may be more suitable for prevention in men and sero-discordant couples. However, recent contradictory effectiveness outcomes in women need to be better understood. EXPERT OPINION: Emerging evidence has brought new hope that antiretrovirals can potentially change the course of the HIV epidemic when used as early treatment for prevention, as topical or oral PrEP. Although some trial results appear conflicting, behavioral factors, adherence to dosing and pharmacokinetic properties of the different tenofovir formulations and dosing approaches offer plausible explanations for most of the variations in effectiveness observed in different trials.

Indexed as

AdenineAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsGelsHIV InfectionsHumansOrganophosphonatesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsTabletsTenofovirAdenineAnti-HIV AgentsGelsOrganophosphonatesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsTabletsTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID22394224
PMCPMC3460694
OpenAlexW2051389464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.