Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22393891›Full record

ReviewFuture microbiology2012

Defense at the border: the blood-brain barrier versus bacterial foreigners.

Nina M van Sorge, Kelly S Doran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Non-corticosteroid adjuvant therapies for acute bacterial meningitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nina M van SorgeUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Medical Microbiology, Heidelberglaan 100, G04.614, 3584 GX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kelly S Doran

Funding

Blood-brain barrier in bacterial meningitisR01NS051247 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DORAN, KELLY S · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051247NINDS NIH HHS R01NS051247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial meningitis is among the top ten causes of infectious disease-related deaths worldwide, with up to half of the survivors left with permanent neurological sequelae. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), composed mainly of specialized brain microvascular endothelial cells, maintains biochemical homeostasis in the CNS by regulating the passage of nutrients, molecules and cells from the blood to the brain. Despite its highly restrictive nature, certain bacterial pathogens are able to gain entry into the CNS resulting in serious disease. In recent years, important advances have been made in understanding the molecular and cellular events that are involved in the development of bacterial meningitis. In this review, we summarize the progress made in elucidating the molecular mechanisms of bacterial BBB-crossing, highlighting common themes of host-pathogen interaction, and the potential role of the BBB in innate defense during infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBlood-Brain BarrierHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMeningitis, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID22393891
PMCPMC3589978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.