Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22393539›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2012

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 for beginners: six key questions.

Lauren R Kett, William T Dauer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Novel targeted therapies for Parkinson's disease.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Autophagy in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Hunter for Aggregates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of Parkinson's disease-related proteins in mediating secondary brain damage after cerebral ischemia.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Protein Kinases and Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. LRRK2 mutations and neurotoxicant susceptibility.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren R KettDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; Department of Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
William T Dauer

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL APPROACHES TO NEUROPROTECTION OF AXONS IN PDrP50NS038370 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BURKE, ROBERT E · 1999 to 2014
$24.0M
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS038370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been intense interest in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) since 2004, when mutations in the LRRK2 gene were discovered to cause dominantly inherited Parkinson's disease (PD). This article will address six basic questions about LRRK2 biology as it relates to PD, with particular emphasis on its discovery, current concepts of its physiological and pathological functions, and the strategies being used to discover how LRRK2 dysfunction causes PD.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytoskeletonDisease ProgressionHumansLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2MicrotubulesMutation, MissenseParkinson DiseaseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein TransportUbiquitin-Protein LigasesLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2LRRK2 protein, humanparkin proteinProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID22393539
PMCPMC3282500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.