Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22393388›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Text mining improves prediction of protein functional sites.

Karin M Verspoor, Judith D Cohn, Komandur E Ravikumar, Michael E Wall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Text Mining for Protein Docking.PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Detection of protein catalytic sites in the biomedical literature.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Annotating the biomedical literature for the human variome.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karin M VerspoorUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America. karin.verspoor@ucdenver.edu
Judith D Cohn
Komandur E Ravikumar
Michael E Wall

Funding

Automated Literature Mining for Validation of High-Throughput Function PredictionR01LM010120 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUNTER, LAWRENCE E · 2009 to 2010
$1.5M
NLM NIH HHS 3R01LM010120-02S1NLM NIH HHS 5R01LM010120-02NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an approach that integrates protein structure analysis and text mining for protein functional site prediction, called LEAP-FS (Literature Enhanced Automated Prediction of Functional Sites). The structure analysis was carried out using Dynamics Perturbation Analysis (DPA), which predicts functional sites at control points where interactions greatly perturb protein vibrations. The text mining extracts mentions of residues in the literature, and predicts that residues mentioned are functionally important. We assessed the significance of each of these methods by analyzing their performance in finding known functional sites (specifically, small-molecule binding sites and catalytic sites) in about 100,000 publicly available protein structures. The DPA predictions recapitulated many of the functional site annotations and preferentially recovered binding sites annotated as biologically relevant vs. those annotated as potentially spurious. The text-based predictions were also substantially supported by the functional site annotations: compared to other residues, residues mentioned in text were roughly six times more likely to be found in a functional site. The overlap of predictions with annotations improved when the text-based and structure-based methods agreed. Our analysis also yielded new high-quality predictions of many functional site residues that were not catalogued in the curated data sources we inspected. We conclude that both DPA and text mining independently provide valuable high-throughput protein functional site predictions, and that integrating the two methods using LEAP-FS further improves the quality of these predictions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCatalytic DomainComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinData MiningHumansModels, MolecularModels, StatisticalMolecular ConformationProteinsProtein Structure, TertiarySequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID22393388
PMCPMC3290545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.