Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22393101›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2012

Adjuvant tamoxifen reduces subsequent breast cancer in women with estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ: a study based on NSABP protocol B-24.

D Craig Allred, Stewart J Anderson, Soonmyung Paik, D Lawrence Wickerham, Iris D Nagtegaal, Sandra M Swain, Elefetherios P Mamounas, Thomas B Julian, Charles E Geyer, Joseph P Costantino and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 356 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer II: radiotherapy of non-invasive neoplasia of the breast.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2014
    Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Phase II Single-Arm Study of Preoperative Letrozole for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Postmenopausal Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: CALGB 40903 (Alliance).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  13. Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen to Prevent Local and Contralateral Recurrence in Breast Intraepithelial Neoplasia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Surgical Excision Without Radiation for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: 12-Year Results From the ECOG-ACRIN E5194 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D Craig AllredNational Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Immunology, 660 Euclid Campus Box 8118, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. dcallred@path.wustl.edu
Stewart J Anderson
Soonmyung Paik
D Lawrence Wickerham
Iris D Nagtegaal
Sandra M Swain
Elefetherios P Mamounas
Thomas B Julian
Charles E Geyer
Joseph P Costantino
Stephanie R Land
Norman Wolmark
Allegheny General Hospital · US

Funding

PRIMARY CANCER THERAPY GROUP--NSABP (HEADQUARTERS)U10CA012027 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2012
$117.2M
NSABP Foreign AccrualsU10CA037377 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2014
$116.5M
STUDY TO ASSESS RALOXIFENE FOR PREVENTING BREAST CANCERU10CA069974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2013
$62.4M
PRIMARY BREAST CANCER THERAPY--BIOSTATISTICS CENTERU10CA069651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2012
$52.1M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA012027NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037377NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069651NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069974NCI NIH HHS U10-CA-12027NCI NIH HHS U10-CA-37377NCI NIH HHS U10-CA-69651NCI NIH HHS U10-CA-69974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe NSABP (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project) B-24 study demonstrated significant benefit with adjuvant tamoxifen in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after lumpectomy and radiation. Patients were enrolled without knowledge of hormone receptor status. The current study retrospectively evaluated the relationship between receptors and response to tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND

methodsEstrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) were evaluated in 732 patients with DCIS (41% of original study population). An experienced central laboratory determined receptor status in all patient cases with available paraffin blocks (n = 449) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using comprehensively validated assays. Results for additional patients (n = 283) determined by various methods (primarily IHC) were available from enrolling institutions. Combined results were evaluated for benefit of tamoxifen by receptor status at 10 years and overall follow-up (median, 14.5 years).

resultsER was positive in 76% of patients. Patients with ER-positive DCIS treated with tamoxifen (v placebo) showed significant decreases in subsequent breast cancer at 10 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; P < .001) and overall follow-up (HR, 0.60; P = .003), which remained significant in multivariable analysis (overall HR, 0.64; P = .003). Results were similar, but less significant, when subsequent ipsilateral and contralateral, invasive and noninvasive, breast cancers were considered separately. No significant benefit was observed in ER-negative DCIS. PgR and either receptor were positive in 66% and 79% of patients, respectively, and in general, neither was more predictive than ER alone.

conclusionPatients in NSABP B-24 with ER-positive DCIS receiving adjuvant tamoxifen after standard therapy showed significant reductions in subsequent breast cancer. The use of adjuvant tamoxifen should be considered for patients with DCIS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMastectomy, SegmentalAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID22393101
PMCPMC3341142
OpenAlexW2138401856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.