Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22392947›Full record

ReviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2012

Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Daniel E Hall, Allan V Prochazka, Aaron S Fink

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07723105 (Digital-Supported Versus Standard Informed Consent for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 115 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07723105 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Digital-Supported Versus Standard Informed Consent for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy: A Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2026 to 2028Enrolled180ConditionsInformed Consent, Patient Education, Patient Comprehension, Therapeutic EndoscopyArmsDigital-Supported Informed Consent Pathway, Standard Physician-Led Informed Consent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel E HallCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Allan V Prochazka
Aaron S Fink

Funding

HSRD VA CDA 08-281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentCommunicationComprehensionComputer-Assisted InstructionDecision MakingDisclosureDocumentationEthics, MedicalHumansPatient Care PlanningPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPatient RightsPersonal AutonomyPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysician's Role

Identifiers

PMID22392947
PMCPMC3307558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.