ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2012
Treatment of acute ischemic stroke with clot retrieval devices.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02126085 (Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical thrombectomy using a combined CT/C-arm X-ray system.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2016Article
- Machine learning for outcome prediction of acute ischemic stroke post intra-arterial therapy.PloS one · 2014Article
- Mechanical thrombectomy devices for endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke: Duke stroke center experience.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2012Article
- Evidence-based changes in devices and methods of endovascular recanalization therapy.Neurointervention · 2012Article
- Safety and efficacy of the Aperio thrombectomy device when compared to the Solitaire AB/FR and the Revive devices in a pulsatile flow system.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2012Article
- Intra-arterial therapy as a rescue strategy after clinically failed intravenous thrombolysis may increase the likelihood of a good outcome in patients with severe ischaemic stroke. A retrospective two centre study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementMechanical clot retrieval is increasingly used for flow-restoration and thrombectomy in acute embolic stroke. Emerging as a treatment option in addition to intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis, it is currently being further developed and investigated as a potential first-line and stand-alone treatment. The ability to rapidly restore flow and effectively retrieve clots from large intracranial arteries is reflected by angiographic data and preliminary clinical results. This article reviews the principles and technical aspects of this new technique, its emergence from the spectrum of intravenous and endovascular stroke treatment, and summarizes the first clinical results for acute ischemic anterior and posterior circulation stroke. Clot retrieval devices are a very promising option for treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the setting of large vessel occlusion. However, there currently exists a reported discrepancy between excellent recanalization rates and less satisfactory clinical outcomes. This problem urgently needs to be addressed in a prospective randomized fashion and improvements of treatment be recognized and implemented before clot retrieval can be considered an established form of acute stroke treatment.
Identifiers
22392611What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.