Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22392611›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2012

Treatment of acute ischemic stroke with clot retrieval devices.

Julian Bösel, Werner Hacke, Martin Bendszus, Stefan Rohde

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02126085 (Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02126085 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital HeidelbergRan2014 to 2016Enrolled150ConditionsAcute Ischemic StrokeArmsEndovascular recanalisation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanical thrombectomy using a combined CT/C-arm X-ray system.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2016
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian BöselDepartment of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany, julian.boesel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Werner Hacke
Martin Bendszus
Stefan Rohde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementMechanical clot retrieval is increasingly used for flow-restoration and thrombectomy in acute embolic stroke. Emerging as a treatment option in addition to intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis, it is currently being further developed and investigated as a potential first-line and stand-alone treatment. The ability to rapidly restore flow and effectively retrieve clots from large intracranial arteries is reflected by angiographic data and preliminary clinical results. This article reviews the principles and technical aspects of this new technique, its emergence from the spectrum of intravenous and endovascular stroke treatment, and summarizes the first clinical results for acute ischemic anterior and posterior circulation stroke. Clot retrieval devices are a very promising option for treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the setting of large vessel occlusion. However, there currently exists a reported discrepancy between excellent recanalization rates and less satisfactory clinical outcomes. This problem urgently needs to be addressed in a prospective randomized fashion and improvements of treatment be recognized and implemented before clot retrieval can be considered an established form of acute stroke treatment.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.