ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Variability of antimicrobial prescribing in patients with acute cellulitis.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeClinical guidelines concerning treatment of infection are incorporated into prescribing formularies and antimicrobial stewardship policies. The extent to which these influence prescribing is uncertain. In this study, we sought to examine antimicrobial prescribing patterns in patients with cellulitis.
methodsConsecutive adults admitted to hospital due to acute cellulitis between 2008 and 2010 were studied. Data collected were clinical and laboratory markers of sepsis, antimicrobial agent, route of administration, number of i.v. dosages, duration of antimicrobial treatment, and hospital length of stay. Three groups were defined by prescribing that was (i) identical to formulary, (ii) modified appropriately due to microbiological data or prior drug allergy, and (iii) nonformulary prescribing. Comparisons were made between groups using Mann-Whitney tests.
resultsThere were 306 patients: 167 men (54.6%), median age 66 (range 18-100) years. Prescribing was consistent with formulary recommendations in 253 (82.7%), modified appropriately in 24 (7.8%), and nonformulary in 29 (9.5%). Median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of hospital stay was 5 (3-8), 7 (5-9, P = 0.026), and 7 (5-14, P = 0.0006) days, and overall duration of antimicrobial therapy was 12 (9-16), 13 (8-15), and 15 (12-19, P = 0.0479) days, respectively. No differences were observed in clinical or laboratory markers of sepsis.
conclusionsPrescribing patterns accorded with prevailing guidelines in the majority of patients. Nonetheless, there was nonformulary prescribing in 10% of patients, and this could not be explained by clinical or laboratory measures of disease severity. Further work is needed to explore the factors that contribute to nonformulary prescribing in this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.