Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22392408›Full record

ReviewHead and neck pathology2012

Sinonasal seromucinous hamartoma: a review of the literature and a case report with focal myoepithelial cells.

K E Fleming, B Perez-Ordoñez, J G Nasser, B Psooy, M J Bullock

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Head and neck pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sinonasal seromucinous hamartoma: a single institution case series combined with a narrative review of the literature.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Seromucinous Hamartoma of the Nasal Cavity.Head and neck pathology · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Sinonasal seromucinous hamartoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K E FlemingDepartment of Pathology (Anatomical Pathology), Capital District Health Authority (QEII Site) and Dalhousie University, 721 Mackenzie Building, 5788 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V8, Canada.
B Perez-Ordoñez
J G Nasser
B Psooy
M J Bullock
Capital District Health Authority · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seromucinous hamartoma is a benign lesion of the sinonasal tract. Since its description in 1974, only a small number of additional cases have been reported. It is composed of a proliferation of seromucinous glands and ducts within a variable fibrous stroma. The serous component typically stains positively for S100 (at least focally) and lacks p63 positive abluminal cells. The lack of myoepithelial/basal cells is an important diagnostic feature of seromucinous hamartoma; their absence could lead to an incorrect diagnosis of low-grade sinonasal adenocarcinoma. We report the case of a polypoid mass resected from the posterior nasal cavity and nasopharynx of a 54-year-old woman. The lesion contained a population of small and large glands lined by cuboidal to flattened cells within a hypocellular stroma varying from dense and sclerotic to myxoid. Additionally, there was a superficial focus of ciliated invaginated surface epithelium and glands. Throughout the lesion there were no cytologic or architectural features of malignancy. The histologic features were diagnostic of seromucinous hamartoma. Immunohistochemistry showed focal S100 positivity of the serous glands. However, in contrast to previously reported cases, the glands focally showed an outer basal layer that was calponin, p63 and actin positive. Our case demonstrates two important points. First, complete absence of p63 staining should not necessarily be a required feature in the diagnosis of seromucinous hamartoma. Second, the ciliated larger glands--in keeping with respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH)--support the suggestion that seromucinous hamartoma and REAH are a spectrum of lesions, often seen together.

Indexed as

Epithelial CellsFemaleHamartomaHumansMiddle AgedMyocytes, Smooth MuscleParanasal Sinuses

Identifiers

PMID22392408
PMCPMC3422584
OpenAlexW1989963767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.