Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22392196›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2012

Increased efficacy of a dose-dense regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Bohuslav Melichar, Helena Hornychová, Hana Kalábová, Hana Bašová, Jindřiška Mergancová, Hana Urminská, Pavel Jandík, Vladimír Cervinka, Jan Laco, Aleš Ryška

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Impact on Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bohuslav MelicharDepartment of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, I.P. Pavlova 6, 775 20, Olomouc, Czech Republic. bohuslav.melichar@fnol.cz
Helena Hornychová
Hana Kalábová
Hana Bašová
Jindřiška Mergancová
Hana Urminská
Pavel Jandík
Vladimír Cervinka
Jan Laco
Aleš Ryška
Charles University · CZPalacký University Olomouc · CZUniversity Hospital Olomouc · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being increasingly used in the treatment of breast carcinoma. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of the results of neoadjuvant therapy in 376 breast carcinoma patients treated with three different regimens combining doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT), dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with sequential weekly paclitaxel (DD AC-P), or the combination of trastuzumab with chemotherapy (DD AC-PT). The expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 was determined immunohistochemically. Pathological response was determined in 318 patients. Pathological complete response (pCR) was observed in 18% of patients. The pCR rate was significantly higher in patients treated with DD regimen (22 vs. 13%) and younger than 55 years (23 vs. 13%). The pCR rate was higher in patients with triple negative (TN) tumors (43%) and tumors over-expressing HER-2 (HER-2+; 28%) compared to patients with ER- or PR-positive tumors not expressing HER-2 (ER/PR+HER-2-; 6%). In patients with TN tumors pCR rate was significantly higher after treatment with DD AC-P compared to AT (61 vs. 22%, p=0.005). pCR was associated with significantly improved relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), but when analysis was performed based on tumor phenotype, the difference was significant only in patients with TN tumors. In multivariate analysis, pCR, stage, and ER expression were significant predictors of RFS, while pCR, stage, ER and DD regimen were significant predictors of OS. In conclusion, present data indicate superiority of a DD regimen in obtaining pCR in patients with breast carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The difference in efficacy is due mostly to markedly higher pCR rate in patients with TN tumors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID22392196
OpenAlexW1964724452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.