Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22390413›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2012

MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas-assessment by pyrosequencing and quantitative methylation-specific PCR.

Annette Bentsen Håvik, Petter Brandal, Hilde Honne, Hanne-Sofie Spenning Dahlback, David Scheie, Merete Hektoen, Torstein Ragnar Meling, Eirik Helseth, Sverre Heim, Ragnhild A Lothe and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04180046 (Glioblastoma Lines as the Disease Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04180046 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Glioblastoma Lines as the Disease Model

TypeobservationalSponsorNeuromed IRCCSRan2019 to 2021Enrolled10ConditionsTumor, Brain Tumor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Cancer genomics & proteomics
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Genetic and epigenetic landscape of OExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gliomas: Assessment of Preanalytical Variables.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Association betweenCells · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A Comparison ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. The Significance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annette Bentsen HåvikSection for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute for Medical Informatics, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, P,O, Box 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway.
Petter Brandal
Hilde Honne
Hanne-Sofie Spenning Dahlback
David Scheie
Merete Hektoen
Torstein Ragnar Meling
Eirik Helseth
Sverre Heim
Ragnhild A Lothe
Guro Elisabeth Lind
Norwegian Cancer Society · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethylation of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter is a favorable prognostic factor in glioblastoma patients. However, reported methylation frequencies vary significantly partly due to lack of consensus in the choice of analytical method.

methodWe examined 35 low- and 99 high-grade gliomas using quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) and pyrosequencing. Gene expression level of MGMT was analyzed by RT-PCR.

resultsWhen examined by qMSP, 26% of low-grade and 37% of high-grade gliomas were found to be methylated, whereas 97% of low-grade and 55% of high-grade gliomas were found methylated by pyrosequencing. The average MGMT gene expression level was significantly lower in the group of patients with a methylated promoter independent of method used for methylation detection. Primary glioblastoma patients with a methylated MGMT promoter (as evaluated by both methylation detection methods) had approximately 5 months longer median survival compared to patients with an unmethylated promoter (log-rank test; pyrosequencing P = .02, qMSP P = .06). One third of the analyzed samples had conflicting methylation results when comparing the data from the qMSP and pyrosequencing. The overall survival analysis shows that these patients have an intermediate prognosis between the groups with concordant MGMT promoter methylation results when comparing the two methods.

conclusionIn our opinion, MGMT promoter methylation analysis gives sufficient prognostic information to merit its inclusion in the standard management of patients with high-grade gliomas, and in this study pyrosequencing came across as the better analytical method.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticTemperatureDacarbazineDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGliomaHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNASurvival AnalysisTemozolomideTumor Suppressor ProteinsDacarbazineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTemozolomideTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22390413
PMCPMC3311573
OpenAlexW2103645386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.