Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22390294›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2013

Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification.

Chia-lin Lee, Erica Middleton, Daniel Mirman, Solène Kalénine, Laurel J Buxbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reduced competition between tool action neighbors in left hemisphere stroke.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Motor experience influences object knowledge.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Putting concepts into context.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chia-lin LeeMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19027, USA. leechial@einstein.edu
Erica Middleton
Daniel Mirman
Solène Kalénine
Laurel J Buxbaum

Funding

Dynamics of Spoken Word Comprehension in AphasiaR01DC010805 · NIDCD · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI MIRMAN, DANIEL · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Understanding the Conceptual-Motor InterfaceR01NS065049 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK · PI BUXBAUM, LAUREL J · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010805NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC010805NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065049NINDS NIH HHS R01NS065049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that action representations are activated during object processing, even when task-irrelevant. In addition, there is evidence that lexical-semantic context may affect such activation during object processing. Finally, prior work from our laboratory and others indicates that function-based ("use") and structure-based ("move") action subtypes may differ in their activation characteristics. Most studies assessing such effects, however, have required manual object-relevant motor responses, thereby plausibly influencing the activation of action representations. The present work uses eyetracking and a Visual World Paradigm task without object-relevant actions to assess the time course of activation of action representations, as well as their responsiveness to lexical-semantic context. In two experiments, participants heard a target word and selected its referent from an array of four objects. Gaze fixations on nontarget objects signal activation of features shared between targets and nontargets. The experiments assessed activation of structure-based (Experiment 1) or function-based (Experiment 2) distractors, using neutral sentences ("S/he saw the....") or sentences with a relevant action verb (Experiment 1: "S/he picked up the...."; Experiment 2: "S/he used the...."). We observed task-irrelevant activations of action information in both experiments. In neutral contexts, structure-based activation was relatively faster-rising but more transient than function-based activation. Additionally, action verb contexts reliably modified patterns of activation in both Experiments. These data provide fine-grained information about the dynamics of activation of function-based and structure-based actions in neutral and action-relevant contexts, in support of the "Two Action System" model of object and action processing (e.g., Buxbaum & Kalénine, 2010).

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyTask Performance and AnalysisAcoustic StimulationAgedAttentionColor PerceptionFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMiddle AgedPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID22390294
PMCPMC3371276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.