Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22389648›Full record

ArticleExpert review of endocrinology & metabolism2011

Outsmarting androgen receptor: creative approaches for targeting aberrant androgen signaling in advanced prostate cancer.

Karen E Knudsen, William Kevin Kelly

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Drivers of Radioresistance in Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Magic and mystery of microRNA-32.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Androgen Receptor Dependence.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen E KnudsenKimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 10th Street, BLSB 1008, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
William Kevin Kelly
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Cyclin D1: repercussions of AR control and alternative splicing in prostate canceR01CA099996 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2003 to 2013
$2.6M
Endocrine disruptors: AR regulation and prostate cancerR01ES016675 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, KAREN E · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099996NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostatic adenocarcinomas are reliant on androgen receptor (AR) activity for survival and progression. Therefore, first-line therapeutic intervention for disseminated disease entails the use of AR-directed therapeutics, achieved through androgen deprivation and direct AR antagonists. While initially effective, recurrent, 'castrate-resistant' prostate cancers arise, for which there is no durable means of treatment. An abundance of clinical study and preclinical modeling has led to the revelation that restored AR activity is a major driver of therapeutic failure and castrate-resistant prostate cancer development. The mechanisms underpinning AR reactivation have been identified, providing the foundation for a new era of drug discovery and rapid translation into the clinic. As will be reviewed in this article, these creative new ways of suppressing AR show early promise.

Identifiers

PMID22389648
PMCPMC3289283
OpenAlexW2113747492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.