Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22389476›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2012

Working together for the common good: cell-cell communication in bacteria.

Ann M Stevens, Martin Schuster, Kendra P Rumbaugh

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Production of aLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cutting through the complexity of cell collectives.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  16. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ann M StevensDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. ams@vt.edu
Martin Schuster
Kendra P Rumbaugh
Oregon State University · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 4th ASM Conference on Cell-Cell Communication in Bacteria was held in Miami, FL, from 6 to 9 November 2011. This review highlights three key themes that emerged from the many exciting talks and poster presentations in the area of quorum sensing: sociomicrobiology, signal transduction mechanisms, and interspecies communication.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsBiological EvolutionGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningQuorum SensingReceptors, Cell SurfaceSignal TransductionSpecies SpecificitySymbiosisReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID22389476
PMCPMC3347067
OpenAlexW2009511198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.