Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22387994›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2012

Reimbursing dentists for smoking cessation treatment: views from dental insurers.

Donna Shelley, Shana Wright, Jennifer McNeely, John Rotrosen, Rebecca F Winitzer, Harold Pollack, Stephen Abel, Lisa Metsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Treating Nicotine Dependence and Preventing Smoking Relapse in Cancer Patients.Expert review of quality of life in cancer care · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Donna ShelleySchool of Medicine, New York University, 227 East 30th Street, Room 608, New York, NY 10016, USA. donna.shelley@nyumc.org
Shana Wright
Jennifer McNeely
John Rotrosen
Rebecca F Winitzer
Harold Pollack
Stephen Abel
Lisa Metsch
New York University · USUniversity of Chicago · USNova Southeastern University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

HIV Testing in Dental Care SettingsR01DE019615 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI METSCH, LISA R · 2009 to 2011
$1.8M
Screening for Substance Use with Computer Assisted Self Interview in Primary CareK23DA030395 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCNEELY, JENNIFER · 2010 to 2014
$905k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA030395NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA027429NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScreening and delivery of evidence-based interventions by dentists is an effective way to reduce tobacco use. However, dental visits remain an underutilized opportunity for the treatment of tobacco dependence. This is, in part, because the current reimbursement structure does not support expansion of dental providers' role in this arena. The purpose of this study was to interview dental insurers to assess attitudes toward tobacco use treatment in dental practice, pros and cons of offering dental provider reimbursement, and barriers to instituting a tobacco use treatment-related payment policy for dental providers.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 dental insurance company executives. Participants were identified using a targeted sampling method and represented viewpoints from a significant share of companies within the dental insurance industry.

resultsAll insurers believed that screening and intervention for tobacco use was an appropriate part of routine care during a dental visit. Several indicated a need for more evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness before reimbursement for these services could be actualized. Lack of purchaser demand, questionable returns on investment, and segregation of the medical and dental insurance markets were cited as additional barriers to coverage.

conclusionsDissemination of findings on efficacy and additional research on financial returns could help to promote uptake of coverage by insurers. Wider issues of integration between dental and medical care and payment systems must be addressed in order to expand opportunities for preventive services in dental care settings.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDentistsEvidence-Based DentistryGeneral Practice, DentalHealth Care SurveysHealth Plan ImplementationHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInsurance CarriersInsurance, DentalSmoking CessationTobacco Use DisorderUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22387994
PMCPMC3457710
OpenAlexW2033199861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.