Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22386926›Full record

ArticleSurgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery

Physicians' attitudes about referring their type 2 diabetes patients for bariatric surgery.

David B Sarwer, Scott Ritter, Thomas A Wadden, Jacqueline C Spitzer, Marion L Vetter, Reneé H Moore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Attitudes about the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery among patients with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index of 30-40 kg/m2.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery
    Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of weight bias and patient-physician communication in the underutilization of bariatric surgery.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reasons for underutilization of bariatric surgery: The role of insurance benefit design.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David B SarwerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. dsarwer@mail.med.upenn.edu
Scott Ritter
Thomas A Wadden
Jacqueline C Spitzer
Marion L Vetter
Reneé H Moore
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Lifestyle Modification versus Bariatric Surgery for Type 2 DiabetesRC1DK086132 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SARWER, DAVID B, WADDEN, THOMAS A. · 2009 to 2010
$1.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1RC1DK086132NIDDK NIH HHS RC1 DK086132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing evidence about the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery, little is known about physicians' attitudes toward it as a treatment of type 2 diabetes. Our objective was to investigate physicians' attitudes about referring patients with type 2 diabetes for bariatric surgery.

methodsPhysicians were identified from the Pennsylvania Integrated Clinical and Administrative Research Database and other databases. Physicians at an academic medical center (n = 142) and community-based physicians (n = 197) in the Philadelphia area in specialties likely to treat type 2 diabetes were sent a survey about their perceptions of the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery as a treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes.

resultsOf the physicians, 93 returned the survey, for a combined response rate of 27.4%. Respondents reported having positive impressions of bariatric surgery as a treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes (79.6% and 67.4%, respectively). Only 20.8% of respondents indicated that they would be likely to refer their patients with type 2 diabetes with a body mass index of 30-34.9 kg/m(2) to a randomized research trial of bariatric surgery.

conclusionIn general, physicians who treat patients with type 2 diabetes had favorable impressions about bariatric surgery as a treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, only a few were willing to refer their patients with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index of 30-34.9 kg/m(2) to randomized research trials of bariatric surgery. This reluctance to refer patients represents an important barrier to the successful completion of studies of the efficacy of bariatric surgery for those with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index <35 kg/m(2).

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBariatric SurgeryReferral and ConsultationAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPennsylvaniaPhysiciansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID22386926
PMCPMC3865449
OpenAlexW1978947604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.