Trial reportWorld journal of surgery
Suppression of the human mucosal-related colonic microflora with prophylactic parenteral and/or oral antibiotics.
Trial report in World journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis.BJS open · 2023Pooled it
- Bundles reduce anastomosis leak in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. A propensity score-matched study.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Re-examining causes of surgical site infections following elective surgery in the era of asepsis.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2020Review
- Preparing the Bowel for Surgery: Learning from the Past and Planning for the Future.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2017Review
- The gut microbiota and gastrointestinal surgery.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Review
- A statewide assessment of surgical site infection following colectomy: the role of oral antibiotics.Annals of surgery · 2010Article
- Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) applied totally to sigmoidectomy: an original technique with survival in a porcine model.Surgical endoscopy · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to assess the effects of preoperative administration of parenteral antibiotics with or without concomitant preoperative administration of oral antibiotics on the colonic mucosal-related microflora. Thirty-one patients were studied in a prospective fashion. Group A patients (n = 8) had colonoscopic mucosal biopsies performed after mechanical bowel preparation. Group B patients (n = 5) received neomycin and erythromycin (NE), 1 g each following mechanical bowel preparation, at 1, 2, and 11 p.m. the evening prior to either elective colon resection (n = 2) or prior to colonoscopic biopsy (n = 3). Emergent trauma patients who had left colon or sigmoid perforations due to gunshot wounds requiring segmental resection comprised group C (n = 7). These patients received cefoxitin or cefotetan 2 g intravenously preoperatively. Individuals in group D (n = 11) all had elective left hemicolectomies or sigmoid resections due to nonobstructing malignancies. These patients underwent the same regimen as group B patients in addition to receiving intravenous cefoxitin perioperatively. Quantitative and qualitative bacterial cultures as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to study the mucosa-associated flora. Tissue for culture and SEM were obtained from the pathologic specimen immediately after removal. The interval between the dosage of parenteral antibiotics to tissue removal was 3 hours in both groups. Anaerobic and aerobic counts were suppressed the greatest in patients receiving both oral and parenteral antibiotics (p = 0.0001). Mean anaerobic counts decreased from 3.4 X 10(7) in group A to 1.8 X 10(2) (mean cfu/g) in group D patients. Mean aerobic counts in group A decreased from 3.7 X 10(6) to 64 (mean cfu/g) in group D.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.