Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2238665›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery

Suppression of the human mucosal-related colonic microflora with prophylactic parenteral and/or oral antibiotics.

M B Smith, V K Goradia, J W Holmes, S G McCluggage, J W Smith, R L Nichols

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The gut microbiota and gastrointestinal surgery.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M B SmithDepartment of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112.
V K Goradia
J W Holmes
S G McCluggage
J W Smith
R L Nichols
Louisiana State University · USUniversity Medical Center New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the effects of preoperative administration of parenteral antibiotics with or without concomitant preoperative administration of oral antibiotics on the colonic mucosal-related microflora. Thirty-one patients were studied in a prospective fashion. Group A patients (n = 8) had colonoscopic mucosal biopsies performed after mechanical bowel preparation. Group B patients (n = 5) received neomycin and erythromycin (NE), 1 g each following mechanical bowel preparation, at 1, 2, and 11 p.m. the evening prior to either elective colon resection (n = 2) or prior to colonoscopic biopsy (n = 3). Emergent trauma patients who had left colon or sigmoid perforations due to gunshot wounds requiring segmental resection comprised group C (n = 7). These patients received cefoxitin or cefotetan 2 g intravenously preoperatively. Individuals in group D (n = 11) all had elective left hemicolectomies or sigmoid resections due to nonobstructing malignancies. These patients underwent the same regimen as group B patients in addition to receiving intravenous cefoxitin perioperatively. Quantitative and qualitative bacterial cultures as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to study the mucosa-associated flora. Tissue for culture and SEM were obtained from the pathologic specimen immediately after removal. The interval between the dosage of parenteral antibiotics to tissue removal was 3 hours in both groups. Anaerobic and aerobic counts were suppressed the greatest in patients receiving both oral and parenteral antibiotics (p = 0.0001). Mean anaerobic counts decreased from 3.4 X 10(7) in group A to 1.8 X 10(2) (mean cfu/g) in group D patients. Mean aerobic counts in group A decreased from 3.7 X 10(6) to 64 (mean cfu/g) in group D.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsColonEnemaHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntestinal MucosaMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID2238665
OpenAlexW1966335249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.