Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22386505›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2012

Asthma outcomes: symptoms.

Jerry A Krishnan, Robert F Lemanske, Glorisa J Canino, Kurtis S Elward, Meyer Kattan, Elizabeth C Matsui, Herman Mitchell, E Rand Sutherland, Michael Minnicozzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Systematic Review of the Effect of Physical Activity on Asthma Outcomes.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Feasibility of a Lifestyle Physical Activity Intervention for Black Women with Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Mixed-methods content and sentiment analysis of adolescents' voice diaries describing daily experiences with asthma and self-management decision-making.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Trial
  9. Validation of the maximum symptom day among children with asthma.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2019
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Tailoring lipid nanoparticles for T-cell targeting in allergic asthma: Insights into efficacy and specificity.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2024
    Article
  20. Linking cognitive and affective heuristic cues to interpersonal risk perceptions and behavior.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jerry A KrishnanUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Robert F Lemanske
Glorisa J Canino
Kurtis S Elward
Meyer Kattan
Elizabeth C Matsui
Herman Mitchell
E Rand Sutherland
Michael Minnicozzi

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory symptoms are commonly used to assess the impact of patient-centered interventions.

objectiveAt the request of National Institutes of Health (NIH) institutes and other federal agencies, an expert group was convened to propose which measurements of asthma symptoms should be used as a standardized measure in future clinical research studies.

methodsAsthma symptom instruments were classified as daily diaries (prospectively recording symptoms between research visits) or retrospective questionnaires (completed at research visits). We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and a search for articles that cited key studies describing development of instruments. We classified outcome instruments as either core (required in future studies), supplemental (used according to study aims and standardized), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at an NIH-organized workshop in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011.

resultsFour instruments (3 daily diaries, 1 for adults and 2 for children; and 1 retrospective questionnaire for adults) were identified. Minimal clinically important differences have not been established for these instruments, and validation studies were only conducted in a limited number of patient populations. Validity of existing instruments may not be generalizable across racial-ethnic or other subgroups.

conclusionsAn evaluation of symptoms should be a core asthma outcome measure in clinical research. However, available instruments have limitations that preclude selection of a core instrument. The working group participants propose validation studies in diverse populations, comparisons of diaries versus retrospective questionnaires, and evaluations of symptom assessment alone versus composite scores of asthma control.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAsthmaCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolHumansMedical RecordsOutcome Assessment, Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22386505
PMCPMC4263029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.