ArticleBiophysical journal2012
Multi-wavelength anomalous diffraction using medium-angle X-ray solution scattering (MADMAX).
Article in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging applications of small angle solution scattering in structural biology.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015Review
- Uniqueness of models from small-angle scattering data: the impact of a hydration shell and complementary NMR restraints.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2015Article
- Investigating increasingly complex macromolecular systems with small-angle X-ray scattering.IUCrJ · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins are dynamic molecules whose function in virtually all biological processes requires conformational motion. Direct experimental probes of protein structure in solution are needed to characterize these motions. Anomalous scattering from proteins in solution has the potential to act as a precise molecular ruler to determine the positions of specific chemical groups or atoms within proteins under conditions in which structural changes can take place free from the constraints of crystal contacts. In solution, anomalous diffraction has two components: a set of cross-terms that depend on the relative location of the anomalous centers and the rest of the protein, and a set of pure anomalous terms that depend on the distances between the anomalous centers. The cross-terms are demonstrated here to be observable and to provide direct information about the distance between the anomalous center and the center of mass of the protein. The second set of terms appears immeasurably small in the context of current experimental capabilities. Here, we outline the theory underlying anomalous scattering from proteins in solution, predict the anomalous differences expected on the basis of atomic coordinate sets, and demonstrate the measurement of anomalous differences at the iron edge for solutions of myoglobin and hemoglobin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.