ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2011
Identification and Precise Mapping of Resistant QTLs of Cercospora Leaf Spot Resistance in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.).
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting the Molecular Roadmap for Sugar Crops: Genome Reading, Trait Writing and Variety Redesigning.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Experimental evolution reveals genomic signatures of variety-specific selection of Cercospora beticola in Germany.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in Beet (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effect of sugar beet variety resistance on the disease epidemiology of Cercospora beticola.Pest management science · 2025Article
- Advancements and prospects of CRISPR/Cas9 technologies for abiotic and biotic stresses in sugar beet.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Cercospora beticola: The intoxicating lifestyle of the leaf spot pathogen of sugar beet.Molecular plant pathology · 2020Article
- Genetic and phenotypic assessment of sugar beet (Breeding science · 2019Article
- New Generation of Resistant Sugar Beet Varieties for Advanced Integrated Management of Cercospora Leaf Spot in Central Europe.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- NMR-Based Metabolic Profiling of Field-Grown Leaves from Sugar Beet Plants Harbouring Different Levels of Resistance to Cercospora Leaf Spot Disease.Metabolites · 2017Article
- OMICS Technologies and Applications in Sugar Beet.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
- SBMDb: first whole genome putative microsatellite DNA marker database of sugarbeet for bioenergy and industrial applications.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complex inheritance of resistance to Cercospora leaf spot (CLS), the most severe fungal foliar disease in sugar beet, was investigated by means of quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis. Over a three year period, recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), generated through a cross between lines resistant ('NK-310mm-O') and susceptible ('NK-184mm-O') to CLS, were field-tested for their resistance to the pathogen. Composite interval mapping (CIM) showed four QTL involved in CLS resistance to be consistently detected. Two resistant QTL (qcr1 on chromosome III, qcr4 on chromosome IX) bearing 'NK-310mm-O' derived alleles promoted resistance. Across 11 investigations, the qcr1 and qcr4 QTL explained approximately 10% and over 20%, respectively, of the variance in the resistance index. Two further QTL (qcr2 on chromosome IV, qcr3 on chromosome VI) bearing 'NK-184mm-O' derived alleles each explained about 10% of the variance. To identify the monogenic effect of the resistance, two QTL derived from 'NK-310mm-O' against the genetic background of 'NK-184mm-O', using molecular markers. The qcr1 and qcr4 were precisely mapped as single QTL, using progenies BC(5)F(1) and BC(2)F(1), respectively. The qcr1 that was located near e11m36-8 had CLS disease severity indices (DSI) about 15% lower than plants homozygous for the 'NK-184mm-O' genotype. As with qcr1, heterozygosis of the qcr4 that was located near e17m47-81 reduced DSI by about 45% compared to homozygosis. These two resistant QTL might be of particular value in marker-assisted selection (MAS) programs in CLS resistance progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.