Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22384156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Addressing cancer disparities via community network mobilization and intersectoral partnerships: a social network analysis.

Shoba Ramanadhan, Carmel Salhi, Erline Achille, Nashira Baril, Kerrie D'Entremont, Milagro Grullon, Christine Judge, Sarah Oppenheimer, Chrasandra Reeves, Clara Savage and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and Validation of a Parental Health-Related Empowerment Scale with Low Income Parents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effects of Sectoral Diversity on Community Coalition Processes and Outcomes.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identifying clinical and support service resources and network practices for cancer patients and survivors in southern Puerto Rico.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multisector Health Policy Networks in 15 Large US Cities.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shoba RamanadhanCenter for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. shoba_ramanadhan@dfci.harvard.edu
Carmel Salhi
Erline Achille
Nashira Baril
Kerrie D'Entremont
Milagro Grullon
Christine Judge
Sarah Oppenheimer
Chrasandra Reeves
Clara Savage
Kasisomayajula Viswanath

Funding

Project Impact: Massachusetts Health Care Reform and Mammography ScreeningU01CA114644 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI VISWANATH, KASISOMAYAJULA · 2005 to 2010
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5 U01 CA114644NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community mobilization and collaboration among diverse partners are vital components of the effort to reduce and eliminate cancer disparities in the United States. We studied the development and impact of intersectoral connections among the members of the Massachusetts Community Network for Cancer Education, Research, and Training (MassCONECT). As one of the Community Network Program sites funded by the National Cancer Institute, this infrastructure-building initiative utilized principles of Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) to unite community coalitions, researchers, policymakers, and other important stakeholders to address cancer disparities in three Massachusetts communities: Boston, Lawrence, and Worcester. We conducted a cross-sectional, sociometric network analysis four years after the network was formed. A total of 38 of 55 members participated in the study (69% response rate). Over four years of collaboration, the number of intersectoral connections reported by members (intersectoral out-degree) increased, as did the extent to which such connections were reported reciprocally (intersectoral reciprocity). We assessed relationships between these markers of intersectoral collaboration and three intermediate outcomes in the effort to reduce and eliminate cancer disparities: delivery of community activities, policy engagement, and grants/publications. We found a positive and statistically significant relationship between intersectoral out-degree and community activities and policy engagement (the relationship was borderline significant for grants/publications). We found a positive and statistically significant relationship between intersectoral reciprocity and community activities and grants/publications (the relationship was borderline significant for policy engagement). The study suggests that intersectoral connections may be important drivers of diverse intermediate outcomes in the effort to reduce and eliminate cancer disparities. The findings support investment in infrastructure-building and intersectoral mobilization in addressing disparities and highlight the benefits of using CBPR approaches for such work.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity NetworksCross-Sectional StudiesHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services ResearchHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMassachusettsNeoplasmsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationPublic HealthRegression AnalysisSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID22384156
PMCPMC3285642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.