ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2011
Dyspnea as the reason for encounter in general practice.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A meta-analysis of four randomized clinical trials to confirm the reliability and responsiveness of the Shortness of Breath with Daily Activities (SOBDA) questionnaire in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2015Pooled it
- Studies of the symptom dyspnoea: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2015Pooled it
- Investigating a structured diagnostic approach for chronic breathlessness in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Trial
- The feasibility of implementing clinical decision support system software in the outpatient assessment of breathlessness: Cardio-LungHealth and Everton in the Community.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Coronary computed tomography angiography in primary care patients with chest pain or dyspnea - a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Voice Analysis and Neural Networks as a Clinical Decision Support System for Patients With Lung Diseases.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- Severe aspiration pneumonia in the elderly.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024Review
- TARGET-HF: developing a model for detecting incident heart failure among symptomatic patients in general practice using routine health care data.Family practice · 2023Article
- Comparing research recruitment strategies to prospectively identify patients presenting with breathlessness in primary care.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2022Article
- Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation.ATS scholar · 2021Article
- Article
- Breathlessness and opioid prescribing in COPD in general practice: a cross-sectional, observational study.ERJ open research · 2020Article
- [Dyspnea : A challenging symptom in the primary care setting].Der Internist · 2020Review
- Activities Forgone because of Chronic Breathlessness: A Cross-Sectional Population Prevalence Study.Palliative medicine reports · 2020Article
- The Integrated Dyspnea Clinic: An Evaluation of Efficiency.International journal of integrated care · 2018Article
- Patient screening for early detection of aortic stenosis (AS)-review of current practice and future perspectives.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- Whole-exome Sequencing Helps the Diagnosis and Treatment in Children with Neurodevelopmental Delay Accompanied Unexplained Dyspnea.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- [Dyspnea].Der Internist · 2017Review
- Breathlessness and presentation to the emergency department: a survey and clinical record review.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2017Article
- The Differential Diagnosis of Dyspnea.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDyspnea is a common reason for consulting a physician. Data from the primary care setting on the epidemiology, management, and underlying causes of dyspnea have seldomly been published. The present study is aimed to explore the consultation prevalence of dyspnea, frequency of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, accompanying symptoms and results of encounter or diagnoses of patients with dyspnea in a day-to-day primary care setting.
methodsCross-sectional data were collected from randomly selected patients during the SESAM 2 study (October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2000). Unpublished but publicly available data from the Dutch Transition Project were also analysed.
resultsOne (n = 93; SESAM 2) and 3.9% (n = 7,855; Transition Project) of the patients consulted the practioner for dyspnea. The male to female ratio was almost 1 : 1. Half of the patients sought medical advice for not previously known dyspnea (Transition Project). Dyspnea occurs more frequently among small children (0 to 4 years) and elderly adults (> 64 years of age). Nearly all patients received a physical examination. Many causes were examined with the help of electrocardiograms but spirometry and laboratory tests were also used. Drug prescription was the most frequent (79.6%) therapeutic procedure. Acute bronchitis was the most common diagnosis. Dyspnea was significantly associated to cough, dysphagia, abnormal sputum, airway pain, sweating, and thoracic pain. There was also a significant association to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
conclusionsDyspnea is a common reason for seeking medical advice. Emergency cases (e.g. myocardial infarction) are rarely present in the general practitioner's consultation. The majority of underlying causes are respiratory tract infections and exacerbated, previously known chronic diseases. KEYWORDS: Dyspnea; General practice; Primary care; Reason for encounter.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.