Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22383782›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2012

Impact of experimental diabetes on the maternal uterine vascular remodeling during rat pregnancy.

Julie K Phillips, Amanda M Vance, Renju S Raj, Maurizio Mandalà, Erika A Linder, Natalia I Gokina

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie K PhillipsDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA. julie.phillips@vtmednet.org
Amanda M Vance
Renju S Raj
Maurizio Mandalà
Erika A Linder
Natalia I Gokina
University of Vermont · USUniversity of Calabria · IT

Funding

PPARy and Uterine Vascular Dysfunction in Diabetic PregnancyR01HL088245 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI GOKINA, NATALIA I · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL088245NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL088245NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD0638082-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Normal pregnancy is associated with an increase in uteroplacental blood flow in part due to growth and remodeling of the maternal uterine vasculature. In this study, we characterized the effect of diabetic pregnancy on vascular growth of the maternal uterine vasculature and on the passive mechanical properties of the uterine resistance arteries. Diabetes was induced in pregnant rats by injection of streptozotocin and confirmed by development of hyperglycemia. Fetuses of diabetic rats were significantly smaller and placentas larger compared to controls. Pregnancy-induced axial elongation of the mesometrial uterine vasculature was not altered by diabetes. Vascular wall thickness was unchanged between groups. Wall distensibility was increased and the rate constant of an exponential function fitted to stress-strain curve was significantly reduced demonstrating decreased wall stiffness in diabetic uterine radial arteries compared to controls. We conclude that experimental diabetes in rat pregnancy does not compromise the growth of maternal uterine vasculature but alters passive mechanical properties of the uterine radial arteries.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiabetic AngiopathiesDisease Models, AnimalFemalePregnancyPregnancy in DiabeticsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyUterine ArteryUterusVascular ResistanceVascular Stiffness

Identifiers

PMID22383782
PMCPMC3343150
OpenAlexW2009582214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.