Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22383207›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2012

Random blood glucose testing in dental practice: a community-based feasibility study from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Andrei Barasch, Monika M Safford, Vibeke Qvist, Randall Palmore, David Gesko, Gregg H Gilbert, Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dentists' Attitudes toward Diabetes Mellitus Screening in Thai Dental Clinics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prediabetes/diabetes screening strategy at the periodontal clinic.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrei BaraschDepartment of General Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA. abarasch@winthrop.org
Monika M Safford
Vibeke Qvist
Randall Palmore
David Gesko
Gregg H Gilbert
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group

Funding

Dental PBRN Network ChairU01DE016747 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2005 to 2011
$17.3M
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Coordinating CtrU01DE016746 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FUNKHOUSER, ELLEN M · 2005 to 2011
$7.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16746NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has been increasing. Instances of patients' not having received a diagnosis have been reported widely, as have instances of poor control of DM or prediabetes among patient's who have the disease. These facts indicate that blood glucose screening is needed.

methodsAs part of The Dental Practice-Based Research Network, the authors conducted a study in community dental practices to test the feasibility of screening patients for abnormal random blood glucose levels by means of glucometers and finger-stick testing. Practitioners and staff members were trained to use a glucometer, and they then screened consecutive patients older than 19 years at each practice until 15 patients qualified for the study and provided consent. Perceived barriers to and benefits of blood glucose testing (BGT) were reported by patients and dental office personnel on questionnaires.

resultsTwenty-eight practices screened 498 patients. A majority of the respondents from the 67 participating dental offices considered BGT useful and worth routine implementation. They did not consider duration of BGT or its cost to be significant barriers. Among patients, more than 80 percent thought BGT in dental practice was a good idea and found it easy to withstand; 62 percent were more likely to recommend their dentists to others if BGT was offered.

conclusionBGT was well received by patients and practitioners. These results support the feasibility of implementation of BGT in community dental practices. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Improved diagnosis and control of DM may be achieved through implementation of BGT in community dental practices.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchPractice Patterns, Dentists'Blood GlucoseBody Mass IndexCommunity DentistryDental ResearchDiabetes MellitusFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningSampling StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID22383207
PMCPMC3296288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.