Trial reportJournal of gastroenterology2012
Randomized trial of peginterferon α-2a plus ribavirin versus peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in Japanese patients.
Trial report in Journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Peginterferon alpha-2a versus peginterferon alpha-2b for chronic hepatitis C.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Meta-analysis: implications of interleukin-28B polymorphisms in spontaneous and treatment-related clearance for patients with hepatitis C.BMC medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Relevance of the Core 70 and IL-28B polymorphism and response-guided therapy of peginterferon alfa-2a ± ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C of Genotype 1b: a multicenter randomized trial, ReGIT-J study.Journal of gastroenterology · 2014Trial
- Economic evaluation of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Thailand: genotype 1 and 6.BMC gastroenterology · 2016Article
- MHC class I-related chain B gene polymorphism is associated with virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.Biomedical reports · 2015Article
- Comparison of peginterferon alfa-2a and alfa-2b for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C: a retrospective study using the Japanese Interferon Database.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Article
- Nanomedicines in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in Asian patients: optimizing use of peginterferon alfa.International journal of nanomedicine · 2014Review
- Multicenter comparison of PEG-IFN α2a or α2b plus ribavirin for treatment-naïve HCV patient in Korean population.BMC gastroenterology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPegylated interferon (PegIFN) plus ribavirin is the standard therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1. Although several randomized clinical trials have compared PegIFNα-2a with PegIFNα-2b, these 2 regimens have not been directly compared in Asian patients. We, therefore, compared the safety and antiviral efficacy of these agents in Japanese patients.
methodsA total of 201 PegIFN-naïve, chronic hepatitis C patients were randomly assigned to once-weekly PegIFNα-2a (180 μg) or PegIFNα-2b (60-150 μg) plus ribavirin. We compared the sustained virological response (SVR) rates between the 2 regimens and analyzed their effects in relation to baseline characteristics, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near the interleukin-28B (IL28B) gene (rs8099917).
resultsPegIFNα-2a was associated with a higher SVR rate than PegIFNα-2b (65.3 vs. 51.0%, P = 0.039). PegIFNα-2a and SNPs near IL28B independently predicted SVR (odds ratio 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-15.50, and odds ratio 7.31; 95% CI 3.45-4.68, respectively) in logistic regression analysis. PegIFNα-2a was more effective than PegIFNα-2b (81.8 vs. 62.7%, P = 0.014) in IL28B TT genotype patients, despite similarly low SVR rates in patients with TG or GG genotypes (36.4 vs. 35.9%). Patients weighing <60 kg, women, and patients aged >60 years had significantly higher SVR rates with PegIFNα-2a than with PegIFNα-2b (63.9, 61.3, and 67.3% vs. 43.8, 43.3,and 39.2%, respectively).
conclusionsPegIFNα-2a plus ribavirin resulted in higher SVR rates than PegIFNα-2b plus ribavirin in Japanese patients. PegIFNα-2a-based treatment should therefore be the preferred choice for women, older or low-weight patients, and those with the IL28B TT genotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22382633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.