ArticleInternational orthopaedics2012
Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia using an oval-shaped cementless press-fit cup.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Prosthesis Survival After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Women with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Narrative Review of Instability, Revision Risk, and Reproductive Health Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Midterm Results of Severe Hip Dysplasia after Using a Cementless Acetabular Component with Bulk Bone Graft in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum Five-Year Follow-Up Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The press-fit technique without screws and bone graft can be used as an alternative method in Crowe type II and III hip dysplasia.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2023Article
- Acetabular Morphology in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip with High Dislocation.Hip & pelvis · 2021Article
- [Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum: revision endoprosthetics].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Review
- [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].Der Orthopade · 2017Article
- Experimental study of the installation acetabular component with uncoverage in arthroplasty patients with severe developmental hip dysplasia.International orthopaedics · 2016Article
- [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].Der Orthopade · 2015Article
- Reconstruction of the Acetabulum in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in total hip replacement.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2014Review
- The techniques of soft tissue release and true socket reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty for patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip.International orthopaedics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcetabular roof deficiency due to subluxation of the femoral head (Hartofilakidis type II) increases the complexity of total hip arthroplasty. In these cases some form of support is usually required, to reach stable fixation of the acetabular component. Pursuing this aim, the oval-shaped cementless cranial socket could be an alternative to conventional treatment options.
methodsBetween 1998 and 2008, 37 patients (40 hips) underwent primary total hip arthroplasty using the cranial socket (mean follow-up 5.6 years, range 26 to 133 months). In a retrospective study we compared these clinical and radiological results with the results of a matched control group consisting of 35 patients (40 hips) treated with a standard cementless hemispherical cup in combination with bulk femoral autografting (mean follow-up 6.9 years, range 30 to 151 months).
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in the HHS (p=0.205) or the SF-36 (p=0.26) between both groups. There was no prosthesis failure due to septic or aseptic loosening. Time of surgery was significantly shorter in the cranial socket group (p<0.001). The acetabular component could be placed in the ideal rotational hip centre in 24 (60%) hips in the cranial socket group and 32 (80%) hips in the control group, respectively.
conclusionsOur study indicates, that the cranial socket can be an alternative treatment option for the reconstruction of acetabular deficiency in osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.