Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22381921›Full record

ArticleAntiviral research2012

Evaluation of disease and viral biomarkers as triggers for therapeutic intervention in respiratory mousepox - an animal model of smallpox.

Scott Parker, Nanhai G Chen, Scott Foster, Hollyce Hartzler, Ed Hembrador, Dennis Hruby, Robert Jordan, Randall Lanier, George Painter, Wesley Painter and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antiviral research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Monkeypox: a global health emergency.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Monkeypox: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Scott ParkerDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, MO 63104, United States.
Nanhai G Chen
Scott Foster
Hollyce Hartzler
Ed Hembrador
Dennis Hruby
Robert Jordan
Randall Lanier
George Painter
Wesley Painter
John E Sagartz
Jill Schriewer
R Mark Buller
Saint Louis University · USChimerix (United States) · USSiga Technologies (United States) · USEmory University · USFleet Science Center · US

Funding

Virology and Smallpox VaccinationsU54AI057160 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAY, RANJIT · 2003 to 2013
$80.9M
Task 9/C23 Mouse Models for InfluenzaN01AI30063 · NIAID · SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · 2008 to 2012
$29.7M
MACROPHAGE DEFENSES AGAINST HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAER29AI030063 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI NOEL, GARY J. · 1990 to 1994
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030063NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI30063NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057160NIAID NIH HHS U54-AI-057169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human population is currently faced with the potential use of natural or recombinant variola and monkeypox viruses as biological weapons. Furthermore, the emergence of human monkeypox in Africa and its expanding environs poses a significant natural threat. Such occurrences would require therapeutic and prophylactic intervention with antivirals to minimize morbidity and mortality of exposed populations. Two orally-bioavailable antivirals are currently in clinical trials; namely CMX001, an ether-lipid analog of cidofovir with activity at the DNA replication stage and ST-246, a novel viral egress inhibitor. Both of these drugs have previously been evaluated in the ectromelia/mousepox system; however, the trigger for intervention was not linked to a disease biomarker or a specific marker of virus replication. In this study we used lethal, intranasal, ectromelia virus infections of C57BL/6 and hairless SKH1 mice to model human disease and evaluate exanthematous rash (rash) as an indicator to initiate antiviral treatment. We show that significant protection can be provided to C57BL/6 mice by CMX001 or ST-246 when therapy is initiated on day 6 post infection or earlier. We also show that significant protection can be provided to SKH1 mice treated with CMX001 at day 3 post infection or earlier, but this is four or more days before detection of rash (ST-246 not tested). Although in this model rash could not be used as a treatment trigger, viral DNA was detected in blood by day 4 post infection and in the oropharyngeal secretions (saliva) by day 2-3 post infection - thus providing robust and specific markers of virus replication for therapy initiation. These findings are discussed in the context of current respiratory challenge animal models in use for the evaluation of poxvirus antivirals.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzamidesBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCell LineCytosineDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEctromelia, InfectiousEctromelia virusFemaleHumansIsoindolesMiceMice, HairlessMice, Inbred C57BLMonkeypox virusBenzamidesBiomarkers, PharmacologicalbrincidofovirCytosineIsoindolesOrganophosphonatesPhthalimidestecovirimat

Identifiers

PMID22381921
PMCPMC3722602
OpenAlexW1973615025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.