Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22380986›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2012

Potential application of serological tests on fluids from carcasses: detection of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii and Sarcoptes scabiei in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes).

Eva-Britt Jakubek, Roland Mattsson, Torsten Mörner, Jens G Mattsson, Dolores Gavier-Widén

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Serological Diagnosis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Hunting for Answers: AssessingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Wild Rabbit Exposure toMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  6. Investigation of the occurrence ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A review of sarcoptic mange in North American wildlife.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neospora caninum and Wildlife.ISRN parasitology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eva-Britt JakubekDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Roland Mattsson
Torsten Mörner
Jens G Mattsson
Dolores Gavier-Widén
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SESwedish Veterinary Agency · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerological surveys for disease investigation of wild animal populations require obtaining blood samples for analysis, which has logistic, ethic and economic difficulties. Applying serological test to fluids collected from dead animals is an alternative. The aim of this study was to assess if antibodies could be detected in two types of fluids collected from 56 carcasses of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes): pleural fluid and lung extract.

findingsIn 22 (39%) foxes antibodies against Sarcoptes scabiei were detected in both fluid types by ELISA and Western blot. In 46 (82%) foxes, antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii were detected in pleural fluid and in 41 (73%) in lung extract applying a Toxo-screen test (DAT). Antibodies were still detectable in the same fluids kept at room temperature for 28 days, although in fewer foxes (16 and 14 foxes tested for T. gondii in lung extract and pleural fluid respectively; and 1 and 4 tested for S. scabiei in lung extract and pleural fluid respectively.

conclusionsThese results indicate the potential utility of using fluids from carcasses for antibody screening of wild animals at the population level.

Indexed as

Agglutination TestsAnimalsAntibodiesAntibodies, ProtozoanBody FluidsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFoxesLungMalePrevalenceSarcoptes scabieiScabiesSwedenThoracic CavityTime FactorsAntibodiesAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID22380986
PMCPMC3315406
OpenAlexW2152389520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.