Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22380973›Full record

ReviewAIDS care2009

Strengthening families to support children affected by HIV and AIDS.

Linda M Richter, Lorraine Sherr, Michele Adato, Mark Belsey, Upjeet Chandan, Chris Desmond, Scott Drimie, Mary Haour-Knipe, Victoria Hosegood, Jose Kimou and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Linda M RichterChild, Youth, Family and Social Development Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa. lrichter@hsrc.ac.za
Lorraine Sherr
Michele Adato
Mark Belsey
Upjeet Chandan
Chris Desmond
Scott Drimie
Mary Haour-Knipe
Victoria Hosegood
Jose Kimou
Sangeetha Madhavan
Vuyiswa Mathambo
Angela Wakhweya
Human Sciences Research Council · ZAErnst & Young (United States) · USFamily Health International 360 · USHarvard University · USInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the arguments for the central role of families, defined very broadly, and we emphasise the importance of efforts to strengthen families to support children affected by HIV and AIDS. We draw on work conducted in the Joint Learning Initiative on Children and AIDS's Learning Group 1: Strengthening Families, as well as published data and empirical literature to provide the rationale for family strengthening. We close with the following recommendations for strengthening families to ameliorate the effects of HIV and AIDS on children. Firstly, a developmental approach to poverty is an essential feature of responses to protect children affected by HIV and AIDS, necessary to safeguard their human capital. For this reason, access to essential services, such as health and education, as well as basic income security, must be at the heart of national strategic approaches. Secondly, we need to ensure that support garnered for children is directed to families. Unless we adopt a family oriented approach, we will not be in a position to interrupt the cycle of infection, provide treatment to all who need it and enable affected individuals to be cared for by those who love and feel responsible for them. Thirdly, income transfers, in a variety of forms, are desperately needed and positively indicated by available research. Basic economic security will relieve the worst distress experienced by families and enable them to continue to invest in the health care and education of their children. Lastly, interventions are needed to support distressed families and prevent knock-on negative outcomes through programmes such as home visiting, and protection and enhancement of children's potential through early child development efforts.

Indexed as

Child WelfareFamily HealthAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdolescentChildChild DevelopmentChild of Impaired ParentsChild, OrphanedChild, PreschoolFemaleFinancial SupportHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHIV InfectionsHumansIncome

Identifiers

PMID22380973
PMCPMC2903779
OpenAlexW2132307643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.