Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22379244›Full record

ArticleSleep2012

Increased prevalence of insomnia and changes in hypnotics use in England over 15 years: analysis of the 1993, 2000, and 2007 National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys.

Maria Calem, Jatinder Bisla, Aysha Begum, Michael Dewey, Paul E Bebbington, Traolach Brugha, Claudia Cooper, Rachel Jenkins, James Lindesay, Sally McManus and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Maria CalemKing’s College London (Institute of Psychiatry), London, UK.
Jatinder Bisla
Aysha Begum
Michael Dewey
Paul E Bebbington
Traolach Brugha
Claudia Cooper
Rachel Jenkins
James Lindesay
Sally McManus
Howard Meltzer
Nicola Spiers
Scott Weich
Robert Stewart

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo investigate changes over 15 years in the prevalence of insomnia and its association with demographic characteristics and hypnotic medication use.

designAnalysis of 3 cross-sectional national mental health surveys carried out in 1993, 2000, and 2007, which used comparable sampling methods and identical insomnia assessments.

settingAdults living in private households in England. PATIENTS OR

participants20,503 people aged 16-64 years. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsInsomnia was defined according to 4 different criteria, using relevant questions from the revised Clinical Interview Schedule. Modest increases in insomnia prevalence were found over the survey periods (any symptoms increasing from 35.0% in 1993 to 38.6% in 2007; insomnia diagnosis from 3.1% to 5.8%, respectively). In all 3 surveys, similar strengths of association in relation to all criteria were found, with female gender, increased age, lower educational attainment, depression, unemployment, economic inactivity, and widowed, divorced, or separated status. Prevalence of hypnotic use was double in 2000 (0.8%) compared to 1993 (0.4%); from limited information on selected medications, there was no such increase between 2000 and 2007. The reasons reported for any sleep disturbance over the last month were generally similar across surveys, the most marked change being illness/discomfort increasing as an explanation from 14.3% to 17.4% to 19.0%.

conclusionsIn the English general population, insomnia (by any definition) showed a modest but steady increase in prevalence over a 15-year period. Strengths of associations with demographic factors and self-reported reasons for sleep disturbance remained reasonably stable over this period.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDemographyEnglandFemaleHealth SurveysHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultHypnotics and Sedativeshypnotic useInsomnianational surveysleeptrends

Identifiers

PMID22379244
PMCPMC3274339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.