Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22378891›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Activity related to perceptual judgment and action in primary auditory cortex.

Mamiko Niwa, Jeffrey S Johnson, Kevin N O'Connor, Mitchell L Sutter

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A hemispheric decoding principle for vestibular heading perception in the posterior sylvian area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Distinct Cortical Populations Drive Multisensory Modulation of Segregated Auditory Sources.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Integrating Visual Information into the Auditory Cortex Promotes Sound Discrimination through Choice-Related Multisensory Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. The Representation of Time Windows in Primate Auditory Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  18. An Emergent Population Code in Primary Auditory Cortex Supports Selective Attention to Spectral and Temporal Sound Features.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mamiko NiwaCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95618, USA.
Jeffrey S Johnson
Kevin N O'Connor
Mitchell L Sutter

Funding

Spectral and Temporal Integration in the Auditory SystemR01DC002514 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MITCHELL L SUTTER · 2001 to 2026
$10.3M
Single-unit response to AM sound in the auditory cortex.F31DC008935 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI NIWA, MAMIKO · 2007 to 2009
$62k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC008935NIDCD NIH HHS F31DC008935NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002514PHS HHS NIDCD 02514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence is reshaping the view of primary auditory cortex (A1) from a unisensory area to one more involved in dynamically integrating multisensory- and task-related information. We found A1 single- (SU) and multiple-unit (MU) activity correlated with macaques' choices in an amplitude modulation (AM) discrimination task. Animals were trained to discriminate AM noise from unmodulated noise by releasing a lever for AM noise and holding down the lever for unmodulated noise. Activity for identical stimuli was compared between trials where the animals reported AM and trials where they did not. We found 47.4% of MUs and 22.8% of SUs significantly increased firing shortly before the animal's behavioral response to report AM when compared to the equivalent time period on trials where AM was not reported. Activity was also linked to lever release in a different task context, suggesting A1 modulation by somatosensory, or efference copy, input. When spikes were counted only during the stimulus, 19.6% of MUs and 13.8% of SUs increased firing rate when animals reported AM compared to when they did not, suggesting an attentional effect, or that A1 activity can be used by higher decision areas, or that such areas provide feedback to A1. Activity associated with AM reporting was correlated with a unit's AM sensitivity, suggesting AM sensitive neurons' involvement in task performance. A1 neurons' phase locking to AM correlated more weakly (compared to firing rate) with the animals' report of AM, suggesting a preferential role for rate-codes in A1 for this AM discrimination task.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingFemaleJudgmentMacaca mulattaMaleRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID22378891
PMCPMC3572866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.