Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22378807›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2012

Conserved properties of Drosophila and human spermatozoal mRNA repertoires.

Bettina E Fischer, Elizabeth Wasbrough, Lisa A Meadows, Owen Randlet, Steve Dorus, Timothy L Karr, Steven Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Some sexual consequences of being a plant.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolved Differences inGenetics · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is transcription in sperm stationary or dynamic?The Journal of reproduction and development · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bettina E FischerDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.
Elizabeth Wasbrough
Lisa A Meadows
Owen Randlet
Steve Dorus
Timothy L Karr
Steven Russell

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now well established that mature mammalian spermatozoa carry a population of mRNA molecules, at least some of which are transferred to the oocyte at fertilization, however, their function remains largely unclear. To shed light on the evolutionary conservation of this feature of sperm biology, we analysed highly purified populations of mature sperm from the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster. As with mammalian sperm, we found a consistently enriched population of mRNA molecules that are unlikely to be derived from contaminating somatic cells or immature sperm. Using tagged transcripts for three of the spermatozoal mRNAs, we demonstrate that they are transferred to the oocyte at fertilization and can be detected before, and at least until, the onset of zygotic gene expression. We find a remarkable conservation in the functional annotations associated with fly and human spermatozoal mRNAs, in particular, a highly significant enrichment for transcripts encoding ribosomal proteins (RPs). The substantial functional coherence of spermatozoal transcripts in humans and the fly opens the possibility of using the power of Drosophila genetics to address the function of this enigmatic class of molecules in sperm and in the oocyte following fertilization.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFertilizationHumansMaleRNA, MessengerSpermatogenesisSpermatozoaRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22378807
PMCPMC3350705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.